I was just playing with quadratic equations and this interesting question came into my mind. Say I have a set of quadratic polynomials $S=\{f_{(b,c)}(x)=x^2+bx+c:b,c\in \{0,1,\cdots, p-1 \}\}$ where $p\in \mathbb{N},\ p\ge 1$. I want to investigate how do the roots of the equations $f_{(b,c)}(x)=0$ vary over the complex plane as $b,c$ are varied. I found all the roots for the equations $f_{(b,c)}=0$ for the case $p=2$, i.e. when $b,c\in\{0,1\}$. I found the roots as $-1,\pm i,\omega,\omega^2,0,0,0$. So $3$ roots are at the origin and the rest of $5$ are on the unit circle $|z|=1$. I found this structure very intriguing. So, is there any general result on this?
2026-03-30 08:58:57.1774861137
Set of Solutions of A Quadratic Equation with Coefficients in $\{0,1,\cdots , \ p-1\}$
77 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPLEX-ANALYSIS
- Minkowski functional of balanced domain with smooth boundary
- limit points at infinity
- conformal mapping and rational function
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- If $u+v = \frac{2 \sin 2x}{e^{2y}+e^{-2y}-2 \cos 2x}$ then find corresponding analytical function $f(z)=u+iv$
- Is there a trigonometric identity that implies the Riemann Hypothesis?
- order of zero of modular form from it's expansion at infinity
- How to get to $\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_C \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} \, dz =n_0-n_p$ from Cauchy's residue theorem?
- If $g(z)$ is analytic function, and $g(z)=O(|z|)$ and g(z) is never zero then show that g(z) is constant.
- Radius of convergence of Taylor series of a function of real variable
Related Questions in FINITE-FIELDS
- Covering vector space over finite field by subspaces
- Reciprocal divisibility of equally valued polynomials over a field
- Solving overdetermined linear systems in GF(2)
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
- Field $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ with $\alpha=\sqrt[3]7+2i$
- Subfield of a finite field with prime characteristic
- Rank of a Polynomial function over Finite Fields
- Finite fields of order 8 and isomorphism
- Finding bases to GF($2^m$) over GF($2$)
- How to arrange $p-1$ non-zero elements into $A$ groups of $B$ where $p$ is a prime number
Related Questions in ROOTS
- How to solve the exponential equation $e^{a+bx}+e^{c+dx}=1$?
- Roots of a complex equation
- Do Irrational Conjugates always come in pairs?
- For $f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ , $\deg(\gcd_{\mathbb{Z}_q}(f, x^p - 1)) \geq \deg(\gcd_{\mathbb{Q}}(f, x^p - 1))$
- The Heegner Polynomials
- Roots of a polynomial : finding the sum of the squares of the product of two roots
- Looking for references about a graphical representation of the set of roots of polynomials depending on a parameter
- Approximating the first +ve root of $\tan(\lambda)= \frac{a\lambda+b}{\lambda^2-ab}$, $\lambda\in(0,\pi/2)$
- Find suitable scaling exponent for characteristic polynomial and its largest root
- Form an equation whose roots are $(a-b)^2,(b-c)^2,(c-a)^2.$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Consider two cases:
The roots are real
The vertex of the parabola is at coordinates $$V\left( -\frac b2, c-\frac{b^2}4 \right)$$ The roots can not be greater than $0$, since the coefficients of the polynomial are not negative. Moreover, the parabola has always the same shape, since the coefficint of $x^2$ is $1$. The modulus of the roots will be maximum when the vertex is most below and most left (sorry for my English), that is, when $b=p-1$ and $c=0$. This gives the root $1-p$.
The roots are not real
Now, the real part is $-b/2$ and the imaginary part is $$\pm\frac{\sqrt{4c-b^2}}2$$
Regardless of sign, the modulus is $$\frac{b^2}4+\frac{4c-b^2}4=c$$ so, again, the moduls of the roots is at most $p-1$.
Summing up, the roots of the polynomials are always on the disc of radius $p-1$. By the way, note that I have made no use for the fact that $p$ is prime, or even integer.