I'm solving a differential equation with some boundary condition. When I use the boundary condition in my solution, should I say ... is true by construction or by assumption? Or should I use some other expression?
2026-03-26 01:07:47.1774487267
Should I use by construction or by assumption?
81 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROOF-WRITING
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Do these special substring sets form a matroid?
- How do I prove this question involving primes?
- Total number of nodes in a full k-ary tree. Explanation
- Prove all limit points of $[a,b]$ are in $[a,b]$
- $\inf A = -\sup (-A)$
- Prove that $\sup(cA)=c\sup(A)$.
- Supremum of Sumset (Proof Writing)
- Fibonacci Numbers Proof by Induction (Looking for Feedback)
- Is my method correct for to prove $a^{\log_b c} = c^{\log_b a}$?
Related Questions in ARTICLE-WRITING
- How to express a sentence having two for all?
- Is there a word that encompasses both "definitions" and "theorems"?
- critique on the style and layout of my proof
- How to state "there exists none, or one and only one..."?
- How should a chain of proof be written?
- How can I make probabilities and expectations conditioned on locations?
- How to choose between a set and a tuple?
- How to Phrase an Induction Proof That Only Goes up to 100?
- Mathematical Writing, Style: Contractions
- What is the best notation to write ``equations with reasons''?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Generally speaking, I would use "by construction" when you are "building" something in order to satisfy peculiar properties you are interest in so that you can use it in your proof and/or when someone else has done it before and you are just talking about his structure. If there is some given definition (that you have set by yourself at the beginning of your research paper, maybe) that you are referring to, you can simply use "by definition (see definition number X.YZ)" in order to invoke it. Now, in your example, you are not assuming anything, just taking the boundary condition (set of contraints, initial condition/data or whethever you wish) in order to solve a calculus problem... so, IMHO, it would be sufficient to call it with its proper name (i.e., just say "by the boundary condition we have set at the beginning" or something like that).