I'm sorta good at finding hamiltonian cycle, but showing that a graph doesn't have one is beyond me.
2026-03-07 19:29:42.1772911782
Show that a graph has no hamiltonian cycle
789 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Related Questions in HAMILTONICITY
- Show that a graph has no hamiltonian cycle
- If every $H$-free $2$-connected graph is Hamiltonian then $H$ is $P_3$
- Question regarding factor group lemma
- Doubt on the definition of closure of a graph.
- Hamiltonian decomposability of 4- regular graphs
- Question regarding the factor group lemma for Cayley graphs
- Is this graph Hamiltonian and how to prove it is not?
- With reference to the Lifting of Hamiltonian cycles
- How to prove that no hamiltonian cycle exists in the graph
- Which vertex removing create a hamilton circuit from Petersen graph
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

A pretty useful necessary condition for the existence of a Hamiltonian cycle is the following result:
This holds because it's true for the cycle graph $C_n$: deleting $k$ vertices from the cycle graph results in $k$ paths, or possibly fewer paths if any of the deleted vertices were adjacent. A Hamiltonian graph is just a cycle graph with some more edges added on, and the extra edges can only reduce the number of components.
This is not a universal test for Hamiltonicity: that would be too much to hope for. However, in many cases, we can use this result to show that a graph is not Hamiltonian. In your example, we can find $5$ vertices whose removal leaves the graph in $6$ connected components, proving that it cannot have a Hamiltonian cycle.