The hint in the appendix of book says that bipartite subgraph with with largest possible number of edges has such a property, but I don't know how to use this hint!
any help would be appreciated.
The hint in the appendix of book says that bipartite subgraph with with largest possible number of edges has such a property, but I don't know how to use this hint!
any help would be appreciated.
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
I'm not sure what "maximal bipartite graph" means. If it means "bipartite spanning subgraph with the maximum possible number of edges" then the hint is correct. Hint. Let $H$ be such a graph, with bipartition $(V_1,V_2)$. Assume for a contradiction that there is a vertex $v\in V$ -- without loss of generality, $v\in V_1$ -- such that $d_H(v)\lt \frac12d_G(v)$. In other words, $v$ has more neighbors in $V_1$ than in $V_2$. [*] Show that, by moving $v$ from $V_1$ to $V_2$, we get a bipartite spanning subgraph with more edges than $H$, contradicting the assumed maximality.
[*] Let $N_G(v)$ be the set of all vertices adjacent to $v$ in the graph $G$. Since $v\in V_1$, we have $$d_H(v)=|N_G(v)\cap V_2|$$ and $$d_G(v)=|N_G(v)|=|N_G(v)\cap V_1|+|N_G(v)\cap V_2|.$$ Thus the assumption $$d_H(v)\lt \frac12d_G(v)$$ is equivalent to $$|N_G(v)\cap V_1|\gt|N_G(v)\cap V_2|$$ which is what I meant by "$v$ has more neighbors in $V_1$ than in $V_2$".