Show that $(\Bbb{N}, \ast)$ is not a subgroup of $(\Bbb{Z},\ast).$

68 Views Asked by At

Let $\ast$ defined on $\mathbb{Z}$ by $a\ast b=a+b-1$ $\forall a,b \in \mathbb{Z}$. Show that $(\mathbb{N},\ast)$ is not a subgroup of $(\mathbb{Z},\ast)$,where $\mathbb{N}$ is the set of natural numbers.

I showed it but I want to know whether it is correct or not?

Firstly I found inverse of element $b \in \mathbb{N}$ and then I found $ab^{-1}$ which is $a-b+1$ but it isn't $\in \mathbb{N}$ then $ab^{-1}$ isn't $\in \mathbb{N}$ so then I think I proved it?

If I am wrong please correct me.

3

There are 3 best solutions below

5
On BEST ANSWER

Well, it is hard to follow your line of reasoning. Is $a-b+1$ not in $\mathbb{N}$ for all choices of $a$ and $b$ or only some? To establish that a subset of a group is not a subgroup of that group, what is it exactly that you need to show?

To show that $(\mathbb{N}, *)$ is not a subgroup it suffices to show that there exists an $a \in (\mathbb{N}, *)$ such that $a^{-1} \not \in (\mathbb{N}, *)$. And indeed $a^{-1} = 2-a$, which is not in $(\mathbb{N}, *)$ if $a \ge 2$ say $a=3.$

3
On

You're on the right track by proving that the inverse operation is not well defined, or not internal. It can be easier to take an element in particular that is in $\mathbb{N}$, but which doesn't have an inverse in $\mathbb{N}$. Do you know about such an element?

0
On

To disprove that $(\mathbb{N}, *)$ is a subgroup of $(\mathbb{Z}, *)$ you need to give a counterexample to one of the axioms. For example, every element in the group needs an inverse that is also in the group.

Let $3=a \in \mathbb{N}$. Now we have to look for the number $a^{-1} \in \mathbb{N}$ and $a*a^{-1} = 1$. Now we know that $a*a^{-1} = a + a^{-1} -1 = 1 \implies a^{-1} = -1$. This is a contradiction to our assumption that $a^{-1} \in \mathbb{N}$. Therefore, $(\mathbb{N}, *)$ cannot be a subgroup of $(\mathbb{Z}, *)$.