As mentioned in the title. I need to show that
$S \vdash A$ when I know that $S \cup \{ \neg A \} \vdash B$
And I can't use completeness theorem here.
I know I can say
$S \vdash \neg A \rightarrow B$
due to what we know. However I don't see how thats helpful. I have also tried to show that $S \cup \{ \neg A \}$ is inconsitent by trying to deduct $\neg B$ or A from it but no success thus far.
Edit.
Just to make sure this is bit more clear as I think the initial version might be bit messy.
So let S be a group of propositional formulas and A a propositional formula. Lets assume that for all propositional formulas B, $S \cup \{ \neg A \} \vdash B$. Now show without completeness theorem that $S \vdash A$.
A theory proves all propositional formulas if and only if it is inconsistent. As such, the assumption that $S \cup \{ \neg A \} \vdash B$ for all formulae $B$ implies that $S \cup \{ \neg A \}$ is inconsistent. Now either $S$ is consistent or it is inconsistent:
In either case we see that, $S \vdash A$.