Show that if $X \subset R$ is bounded above, then $\overline{X}$ is also bounded above.
Here $\overline{X} = \{a\in \mathbb{R} \text{ | if }a\text{ is an adherence point of }X \}$
My Proof by contrapositive:
Suppose that $\overline{X}$ is not bounded above, therefore if $a \in \overline{X}$ then $\exists \epsilon > 0$ such that $(a+\epsilon) \in \overline{X}$.
Let $a \in \overline{X}$. Since $a$ is point of adherence of $X$, it follows that $\forall \epsilon > 0$ $X \cap (a-\epsilon, a+\epsilon) \neq \emptyset$. Let's call $x$ a value of $X$ in that open interval.
Since $\overline{X}$ is unbounded above, $\exists \epsilon_0 > 0$ such that $(a+\epsilon_0) \in \overline{X}$ which implies that $\forall \epsilon' > 0$ $X \cap \big( (a+\epsilon_0) - \epsilon', (a+\epsilon_0) + \epsilon' \big) \neq \emptyset$
Since $X \cap \big( (a+\epsilon_0) - \epsilon', (a+\epsilon_0) + \epsilon' \big) \neq \emptyset$, Let's call $x'$ a value of $X$ in that open interval.
Now let's choose $\epsilon < \epsilon_0 - \epsilon'$. Hence: $a + \epsilon < a + \epsilon_0 - \epsilon'$. With that we guarantee that every element of $X$ in the second interval is bigger than every element of $X$ in the first open interval.
Finally it follows that $x' > x$. Therefore $X$ is unbounded above.
I really think that my proof is valid and correct. What do you think? I'd appreciate any kind of constructive critics to help me to improve my approach. Thanks!
It looks correct, but it is much easier to prove it as follows: let $M$ be an upper bound of $X$. Then$$(\forall x\in X):x\leqslant M$$and therefore, since $(-\infty,M]$ is a closed set, $\overline X\subset(-\infty,M]$. In other words,$$\left(\forall x\in\overline X\right):x\leqslant M.$$