Show that $\omega = dF$ when $\omega = \sum_{i=1}^n f_i(x)dx_i$ and $F = \frac{1}{p+1} \sum_{i=1}^n x_if_i(x)$

80 Views Asked by At

Let $f_i : \mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\} \to \mathbb{R}$ be a homogeneous function of degree $p \neq -1$ for every $1 \le i \le n$. Namely, $f_i(tx) = t^pf_i(x)$ for every $ x \in\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\}$ and $t >0$.

We define $\omega = \sum_{i=1}^n f_i(x)dx_i$ and assume it is closed.

I want to prove that $\omega = dF$ when $F = \frac{1}{p+1} \sum_{i=1}^n x_if_i(x)$

Basically want we want to show is that $\frac{\partial F}{\partial x_i} = f_i(x)$.

By straightforward deriving I get: $$ \frac{\partial F}{\partial x_i} = \frac{1}{p+1} (\sum_{j=1}^n x_j\frac{\partial f_j(x)}{\partial x_i} + f_i(x))$$

Here I got stuck. I don't know how to continue. I also don't see how the information that $\omega$ is closed (namely, $\frac{\partial f_i(x)}{\partial x_j} = \frac{\partial f_j(x)}{\partial x_i}$ for $i \neq j$) helps me here. I also don't know how to use the fact thar $f_i$ are homogeneous because it is not given that $x_i > 0$.

Help would be appreciated.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

5
On BEST ANSWER

Hint: ${d\over{dt}}_{t=1}f_i(tx)={d\over{dt}}_{t=1}t^pf_i(x)=pf_i(x)$.

You can also compute it as follows

${d\over{dt}}_{t=1}f_i(tx)=(\sum_{j=1}^{j=n}x_j{{\partial f_i}\over{\partial x_j}})_{t=1}$

$=\sum_{j=1}^{j=n}x_j{{\partial f_i}\over{\partial x_j}}$.

If you replace the second formula by the first in your computations, you obtain the result.

0
On

Assume $x_1$, $x_2$, $\ldots$, $x_n$ are all positive. Then, for fixed $i$, we can write $$ f_i(x_1,\ldots, x_i, \ldots, x_n) = x_i^{p} f_i\left(\tfrac{x_1}{x_i},\ldots,\tfrac{x_{i-1}}{x_i}, 1,\tfrac{x_{i+1}}{x_i}, \ldots,\tfrac{x_n}{x_i}\right)\,. $$ Now, $$ F(x)=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i f_i(x)=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^{p+1}f_i\left(\tfrac{x_1}{x_i},\ldots,\tfrac{x_{i-1}}{x_i}, 1,\tfrac{x_{i+1}}{x_i}, \ldots,\tfrac{x_n}{x_i}\right)\,. $$ Consider, for fixed $j$, $$ \frac{\partial}{\partial x_j}F= (p+1)x_j^{p+1}f_j\left(\tfrac{x_1}{x_j},\ldots,\tfrac{x_{j-1}}{x_j}, 1,\tfrac{x_{j+1}}{x_j}, \ldots,\tfrac{x_n}{x_j}\right)\\ +\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^{p+1}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_j}f_i\left(\tfrac{x_1}{x_i},\ldots,\tfrac{x_{i-1}}{x_i}, 1,\tfrac{x_{i+1}}{x_i}, \ldots,\tfrac{x_n}{x_i}\right)\,. $$ We recognize the first term on the right-hand side as $(p+1)f_j(x)$. The second term, appropriately separating the terms in the sum, gives $$ \sum_{i\neq j} x_i^{p+1}\frac{\partial }{\partial x_j} f_i\left(\tfrac{x_1}{x_i},\ldots,\tfrac{x_{i-1}}{x_i}, 1,\tfrac{x_{i+1}}{x_i}, \ldots,\tfrac{x_n}{x_i}\right)\\ + x_j^{p+1} \frac{\partial }{\partial x_j}f_j\left(\tfrac{x_1}{x_j},\ldots,\tfrac{x_{j-1}}{x_j}, 1,\tfrac{x_{j+1}}{x_j}, \ldots,\tfrac{x_n}{x_j}\right)\\ = \sum_{i\neq j} \frac{x_i^{p+1}}{x_i}\frac{\partial f_i}{\partial x_j}\left(\tfrac{x_1}{x_i},\ldots,\tfrac{x_{i-1}}{x_i}, 1,\tfrac{x_{i+1}}{x_i}, \ldots,\tfrac{x_n}{x_i}\right)\\ +\sum_{k\neq j} \frac{-x_j^{p+1}x_k}{x_j^2} \frac{\partial f_j}{\partial x_k}\left(\tfrac{x_1}{x_j},\ldots,\tfrac{x_{j-1}}{x_j}, 1,\tfrac{x_{j+1}}{x_j}, \ldots,\tfrac{x_n}{x_j}\right)\\ =\sum_{k\neq j} x_k\left(\frac{\partial }{\partial x_j}f_k-\frac{\partial}{\partial x_k}f_j\right)=0\,. $$ In the last step we used the closedness property; note that, for $k\neq j$, $$ \frac{\partial}{\partial x_k}f_j(x)=x_j^{p-1} \frac{\partial f_j}{\partial x_k}\left(\tfrac{x_1}{x_j},\ldots,\tfrac{x_{j-1}}{x_j}, 1,\tfrac{x_{j+1}}{x_j}, \ldots,\tfrac{x_n}{x_j}\right)\,. $$ When some $x_i$ is allowed to be negative, the argument can be repeated by replacing the $1$ with $-1$ appropriately.