$E$ is the splitting field of $f(x)\in\mathbb{Q}[x]$ s.t. $[E:\mathbb{Q}] = 4$. $E$ has 2 distinct quadratic subextensions, $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{m}),\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{n})$. Prove that $Gal(E/\mathbb{Q}) \cong \mathbb{Z}_2\times \mathbb{Z}_2$ and that every quadratic subextension of $E$ is either $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{m}),\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{n})$ or $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{mn})$.
My attempt:
1) $E \cong \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{m},\sqrt{n})$ and the minimal polynomial for $\sqrt{m},\sqrt{n}$ is $(x^2-m)(x^2-n)$ the roots of which are $\pm \sqrt{m},\pm \sqrt{n}$. Let $Gal(E/\mathbb{Q}) = \{e,\sigma,\tau,\sigma \tau\}$. Let $\sigma(\sqrt{m}) = -\sqrt{m}$. Now I need to show that $\sigma(\sqrt{n}) = \sqrt{n}$ to conclude that the order of $\sigma = 2$. I don't know how use to use the fact that $\sigma$ is a homomorphism to conclude that?
2) I can see that the only subextensions $K$ of $E$ such that $4 = [E:\mathbb{Q}] = [E:K][K:\mathbb{Q}]$ and $[E:K] = [K:\mathbb{Q}] = 2$ are $K=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{m}),\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{n})$ or $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{mn})$ but how can I formally say that? Thanks!
For your attempt, saying $\sigma(\sqrt m) = -\sqrt m$ is fine, but you don't show that $\sigma(\sqrt n) = \sqrt n$, you define $\sigma$ to be that way. Then you define $\tau$ by $\tau(\sqrt m) = \sqrt m, \tau(\sqrt n) = -\sqrt n$. This makes it so that $\sigma\tau(\sqrt x) = \tau\sigma(\sqrt x) = -\sqrt x$ for $x = m, n$.
Note that you can't show that $\sigma(\sqrt n) = \sqrt n$. Because there are two elements $\eta$ in the Galois group which have the property $\eta(\sqrt m) = -\sqrt m$. It is (in theory) arbitrary which one of them you happen to call $\sigma$. So you have to tell us which one you choose. It can't be "proven" in any way.
I think the easiest way to solve this problem is by the fundamental theorem of Galois theory. You know the Galois group has $4$ elements, and there are therefore only two possible groups it could be. Each nontrivial subextension corresponds to a non-trivial, proper subgroup of the Galois group, and since there are two distinct non-trivial subextensions, you have two distinct, nontrivial, proper subgroups. This eliminates $\Bbb Z_4$ as a contender, without even looking at the elements of the Galois group.