I tried to do it with ternary/binary expansions by finding two injections and then use the Cantor-Bernstein-Schröder Theorem, but I wonder if there is some easier method to prove this.
2026-02-24 04:40:15.1771908015
Show that there is a bijection between $2^{\mathbb{N}}$ and $\mathbb{R}$
68 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in BINARY
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- Produce solutions such that $k$&$x$ $=$ $k$,in a range ($0$,$n$)
- Solve an equation with binary rotation and xor
- Number of binary sequences with no consecutive ones.
- Recurrence with $\lfloor n/2 \rfloor$
- Converting numbers to different bases
- Why does the decimal representation of (10^x * 10^y) always suffix the same representation in binary?
- Period of a binary sequence
- Contradiction in simple linear regression formula
- From unary to binary numeral system
Related Questions in CANTOR-SET
- Removing closed sets to form Cantor Middle Third Set
- Show that $C-C=[-1,1].$
- Provide a bijection between power set of natural numbers and the Cantor set in $[0,1]$
- How to refine a covering of the Cantor set by intervals to a covering by disjoint segments?
- Finding a bijection between the Cantor set and $[0, 1]$
- Is there an uncountable collection of pairwise disjoint second category subsets of Cantor space?
- Proof that the set Gamma is the Cantor Middle-thirds Set
- If $f:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}$ is a function of first class, does it mean that $f$ is continuous everywhere except countably many points in $[a,b]?$
- Binary representation of Cantor set?
- Find an explicit homeomorphism between the Cantor set and a proper subset of the Cantor set
Related Questions in FIRST-COUNTABLE
- Prove that $\prod X_\alpha$ is first (second)-countable if and only if $X_\alpha$ is first (second)-countable, $\forall \alpha\in I.$
- If X satisfies the first or second countability axiom then $F(X)$ satisfies the same condition.
- Check properties of the topology $\{U \subseteq \mathbb{R} \mid \forall x \in U: \exists \epsilon > 0: [x, x + \epsilon[ \subseteq U\}$
- Let $(X,\tau_x)$ first counable space , $(Y,\tau_y)$, prove that pra image f of an open set in Y, contains open set
- If a space is first countable, does that imply it is locally compact?
- A first countable, countably compact space is sequentially compact
- The continuous image of a First Countable Space need not be First Countable (Willard 16.B.1)
- Is the topology of weak convergence of probability measures first-countable?
- A first countable hemicompact space is locally compact
- Neighborhood basis in the discrete metric space and first countability
Related Questions in TERNARY-EXPANSION
- Ternary Negatives
- A description of the Cantor set, Sierpinski carpet, and Menger sponge.
- Show the existence of a locally compact, perfect set in $[0,1]$ which has the following property.
- Compare the numbers in base $3$
- Ternary Strings Induction
- How to prove that Cantor ternary set has no intervals using ternary expansions?
- Proving That The Cantor Set is Uncountable Using Base-3
- Prove you can weigh any number between 1 and $\frac{3^{n+1} -1}{2}$ using $n+1$ weights - Discrete
- Counting with Recurrence Relations
- Number of $1$'s in the ternary representation of $x$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Because of the issue of $0.999\ldots =1$, and more generally that any standard number system representation is non-injective (as a function from sequences of digits to $\Bbb R$), I sincerely doubt there is an easier way. Assuming you already have access to the CBS theorem.
If you do not have access to the theorem, and don't want to include a full proof of it in your proof, then it might be simpler to fix the above issue directly, similar to how you would normally prove that $(0,1]$ and $(0,1)$ are equinumerous, by moving $1$ to $\frac 12$, moving $\frac12$ to $\frac13$, and so on.