Let $x \in \mathbb{R}^3,$ and let $v(x) : \mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb{R}^3$ be smooth with the property that $-1 < \nabla \cdot v.$ Suppose $u$ solves $$ u_t + \nabla u \cdot v = 0, $$ with $$u(x,0) = \chi_{|x| \leq 1}(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & |x| \leq 1 \\ 0 & \text{else} \end{cases}$$ Show that $\{x \in \mathbb{R}^3 \, : \, u(x,1) > 0\}$ has measure greater than $4/3.$
Here, we know the solution is given by $u(x,t) = u(x_0, 0),$ and the characteristics for $x_i, \; i=1,2,3$ are given by $$ \frac{dx_i(t)}{dt} = v_1(x_1,x_2,x_3). $$
I've been struggling with this, so to start, I decided to convince myself that the problem is true for the easiest case of $v$ I could think of. Let $v(x) = v(x_1,x_2,x_3) = (-\frac{x_1}{3},-\frac{x_2}{3},-\frac{x_3}{3}).$ Sure, $\nabla \cdot v = -1,$ but let's see what happens.
The characteristic equations are
$$ \frac{dx_i(t)}{dt} = -\frac{x_i}{3},
$$
so $x_i(t) = x_{i_0}e^{-t/3}.$ What this says is that at $t = 1,$ the radius of the initial ball has shrunk from $1 \to e^{-1/3},$ and therefore the volume of the support is $\frac{4\pi}{3} (e^{-1/3})^3 = \frac{4\pi}{3e} > \frac{4}{3}.$
However, this hasn't done me any good for showing it for arbitrary $v(x).$ Does anyone see a more intelligent method to go about this problem?
A sketch of an idea:
Set $U(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} u(x, t) \, dx.$ Then $$U(0) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \chi_{|x|<1}(x) \, dx = \frac{4\pi}{3}$$ and $$ U'(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \partial_t u(x, t) \, dx = - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \nabla u(x, t) \cdot v \, dx \\ = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} u(x, t) \, \nabla \cdot v \, dx > - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} u(x, t) \, dx = - U(t). $$ where I have used partial integration and that $\nabla \cdot v > -1$.
The first question is now whether $U'(t) > -U(t)$ and $U(0)>0$ implies that $U(t) > U(0) \, e^{-t}$ for all $t>0$. If so, we have $$U(1) > \frac{4\pi}{3} \, e^{-1} = \frac43 \frac\pi e > \frac43.$$
The second question is whether we must have $u(x,t) \in [0, 1]$ for $t>0$, i.e. $u$ cannot increase and be larger than $1$. If so, then for $U(1) > \frac43$ to be true, we must have $m(\operatorname{supp}_x u(x, 1)) > \frac43.$