I am looking for a proof of the following argument, which comes from a book:
Proposition: Let $u$ be a holomorphic function on $\mathbb C-{0}$, and assuming that there exists $c>0$ such that for all $z\in \mathbb C-{0}$$$|z\frac{du}{dz}|\le c|u(z)| $$ Then $u$ is meromorphic along origin.
The book claims that it is a consequence of Gronwall's inequality:
If $f(t)\ge 0, g(t)\ge 0$ are non-negative functions on $0<t\le t_0$ such that $$f(t)\le a+c\int_t^{t_0}g(s)f(s)ds$$ for some $a\ge0,c\ge 0$, then we have $$f(t)\le a\cdot exp(c\int_t^{t_0}g(s)ds)$$
I tried a little bit but I didn't get anything meaningful with given inequality and the hint. In particular, I don't know what estimate I should get to show that $u$ is meromorphic.
Thanks in advance for any help!
I'm going to write $f=\mu$, sorry.
Don't know about Gronwall, but it's easy to see from Complex 101 that in fact $f(z)=az^n$ for some integer $n$. Assume $f$ is not identically zero.
Let $$g(z)=\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}.$$A priori $g(z)$ is defined only for $z\ne0$ with $f(z)\ne0$. But $g$ is bounded near each zero of $f$, hence has a removable singularity there. And now by the same argument $g$ has a removable singularity at the origin.
So $g$ is a bounded entire function, hence constant. So $zf'(z)=Cf(z)$. Now if $$f(z)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty a_n z^n$$it follows that $$na_n=Ca_n$$for every $n$; hence $a_n=0$ unless $n=C$. So if $C$ is not an integer then $f=0$, while if $C=n$ is an integer then $f(z)=a_nz^n$.