I am struggling to understand the proof in the textbook.
Let $A$ contain elements $x$, and $x$ is real number which satisfies $x^2 < 2$. Let $\sup A = r$, and show that $r^2 \ge 2$.
In the textbook, the proof:
Let $s$ be a positive number $s$ such that $s^2 < 2$ and try to find that $(s+h)^2 < 2$.
So assuming $0 < h < \dfrac{2-s^2}{2s+1}$, and also $h < 1$, it shows that $(s+h)^2 < 2$. $s+h$ is also an element of $A$, since it satisfies the condition. (I understand up to here).
But, I don't understand the conclusion:
As $s$ was an arbitrary positive number such that $s^2 < 2$, it follows that $r^2 \ge 2$.
Why is it necessarily true?? Thanks for helping me in advance.
Because, if $r$ is the sup, you can't find a bigger number verifying also this condition.
Here, if a number $s$ is such that $s^2<2$, he cannot be the sup, since you can find $s+h$ (hence strictly bigger then $s$) verifying the same condition. So $r$ cannot be such that $r^2<2$ : consequently $r^2\geq 2$.
But it is true that using a proof by contradiction would be more easy to understand.