The equation of the plane is given in its parametric form. Will it suffice to show that the direction vector of the line is a linear combination of two linearly independent vectors in the plane? This would mean that the direction vector of the line lies in the plane, so it would imply that it is parallel to the plane.
2026-04-01 17:49:02.1775065742
Showing that a line, given it does not lie in a plane, is parallel to the plane?
315 Views Asked by user440261 https://math.techqa.club/user/user440261/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in VECTOR-SPACES
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Does curl vector influence the final destination of a particle?
- Closure and Subsets of Normed Vector Spaces
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
- Linear Algebra and Vector spaces
- Is the professor wrong? Simple ODE question
- Finding subspaces with trivial intersection
- verifying V is a vector space
- Proving something is a vector space using pre-defined properties
- Subspace of vector spaces
Related Questions in VECTORS
- Proof that $\left(\vec a \times \vec b \right) \times \vec a = 0$ using index notation.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- Why does AB+BC=AC when adding vectors?
- Prove if the following vectors are orthonormal set
- Stokes theorem integral, normal vector confusion
- Finding a unit vector that gives the maximum directional derivative of a vector field
- Given two non-diagonal points of a square, find the other 2 in closed form
- $dr$ in polar co-ordinates
- How to find reflection of $(a,b)$ along $y=x, y = -x$
Related Questions in EUCLIDEAN-GEOMETRY
- Visualization of Projective Space
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
- Circle inside kite inside larger circle
- If in a triangle ABC, ∠B = 2∠C and the bisector of ∠B meets CA in D, then the ratio BD : DC would be equal to?
- Euclidean Fifth Postulate
- JMO geometry Problem.
- Measure of the angle
- Difference between parallel and Equal lines
- Complex numbers - prove |BD| + |CD| = |AD|
- Find the ratio of segments using Ceva's theorem
Related Questions in PLANE-GEOMETRY
- Euclidean Fifth Postulate
- Line coordinates from plane intersection
- Properties of a eclipse on a rotated plane to see a perfect circle from the original plane view?
- Perfect Pascal Mysticum Points
- Intersection of a facet and a plane
- Proving formula to find area of triangle in coordinate geometry.
- Prove that the intersection of a cylinder and a plane forms an ellipse
- Rank of Matrix , Intersection of 3 planes
- Composite of two rotations with different centers
- Can a plane be perpendicular in two other planes if those planes are not parallel to each other?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
In parametric form, the plane is formed by points $\vec{p}(u, v)$ (and $u, v \in \mathbb{R}$), where $$\vec{p}(u, v) = \vec{p}_0 + u \, \vec{e}_u + v \, \vec{e}_v$$ and the vectors $\vec{e}_u$ and $\vec{e}_v$ are not parallel, i.e. $$\lVert \vec{e}_u \rVert \, \lVert \vec{e}_v \rVert \ne \lvert \vec{e}_u \cdot \vec{e}_v \rvert$$ or $$\vec{e}_u \times \vec{e}_v \ne 0$$
Let's say you have line $\vec{r}(t)$ ($t \in \mathbb{R}$), $$\vec{r}(t) = \vec{r}_0 + t \, \vec{r}_t$$
If the question is
the answer is Yes, of course, because that is one way to define "parallel to a plane".
If the question is
then the answer is something like two easiest methods are
Showing that $$\vec{r}_t = \alpha \, \vec{e}_u + \beta \, \vec{e}_v$$ with constants $\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{R}$, as already noted
Showing that $$\vec{r}_t \cdot \left ( \vec{e}_u \times \vec{e}_v \right ) = 0$$which is just another way to express the definition of $\vec{r}_t$ being parallel to the plane $\vec{p}(u, v)$.
Note that because this is a triple product, we can write the same equality as $$\vec{e}_u \cdot \left ( \vec{e}_v \times \vec{r}_t \right ) = 0$$ or as $$\vec{e}_v \cdot \left ( \vec{r}_t \times \vec{e}_u \right ) = 0$$
Personally, the latter method (using any one of the three triple product forms) is "easiest" for me, in particular because I don't need to introduce $\alpha$ and $\beta$ — but then again, I'm not a mathematician; I just use math as a tool for solving problems.
If we use $\vec{r}_t = ( x_t , y_t , z_t )$, $\vec{e}_u = ( x_u , y_u , z_u )$, and $\vec{e}_v = ( x_v , y_v , z_v )$, the triple product can be written as $$x_t ( y_u z_v - y_v z_u ) + y_t ( x_v z_u - x_u z_v ) + z_t (x_u y_v - x_v y_u) = 0$$