Let $S\mathcal(R)$ be the Schwartz space. I want to show that if $f \in S\mathcal(R)$ then $f/P \in S\mathcal(R)$ where P is any strictly positive polynomial. I succeeded to show it for the case of $g(x)=e^{-x^{4}}/(1+x^{2})$ but i did not in the general case. Can someone help? Thank you.
2026-03-25 21:51:16.1774475476
Showing that the quotient of a function belonging to Schwartz Space by a strictly positive polynomial remains in the Schwartz Space
174 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in SCHWARTZ-SPACE
- Why is it so obvious that $x^k e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}}$ is a Schwartz-function? (Verification)
- Schwartz kernel theorem and dual topologies
- Convolution Identity for Schwartz Space
- Prove that if $f \in \mathcal L^1(\mathbb R)$ then $fx^n \in \mathcal S'(\mathbb{R})$
- Schwartz kernel theorem and order of distribution
- Help understanding the weak topology on the dual of the Schwartz space?
- Why is the space of compactly supported smooth functions contained in the Schwartz space?
- reshape $(2\pi)^{-n/2} \int_{\mathbb R^n} \mathcal F(\varphi) (\xi) e^{- \frac{\varepsilon^2|\xi|^2}{2}} e^{i\langle x, \xi \rangle} d\xi$
- Continuity of Fourier Transform between Schwartz Space
- If $\hat{f}\in L^2(\mathbb{R})$ then $\hat{f}$ is rapidly decreasing.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Since $P$ is strictly positive, all you need to show is that $x^m D^k (f/P)$ is bounded on all of $\mathbb{R}$ for all $m$ and $k$; in particular, by continuity of everything in sight, it suffices to show that $x^m D^k (f/P)$ is bounded outside of some neighbourhood $[-\epsilon,\epsilon]$ of $0$.
Suppose that $P$ is of degree $n$, and write $P = a_n x^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1} + \cdots + a_0$. Observe that $$ P(x) = a_n x^n \left(1+ \frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n} x^{-1} + \cdots + \frac{a_0}{a_n} x^{-n} \right) = a_n x^n (1 + g(x)), $$ where $g$ is continuous, indeed smooth, for $x \neq 0$, and satisfies $g(x) \to 0$ as $x \to \infty$. Then, for any $m \in \mathbb{N}$, when $x \neq 0$, $$ x^m \frac{f(x)}{P(x)} = x^m \frac{f(x)}{a_n x^n (1+g(x))} = \frac{x^{m-n}f(x)}{a_n(1+g(x))}, $$ which vanishes as $x \to \infty$ if $m < n$ and is bounded outside of $[-\epsilon,\epsilon]$ if $m \geq n$, precisely because $f \in S(\mathbb{R})$ and $\lim_{x \to \infty} g(x) = 0$.
Now, in general, along exactly the same lines, one can check that $$ P^{(k)}(x) = a_{n,k} x^{n-k}(1+g_k(x)), \quad a_{n,k} := n(n-1) \cdots (n-k+1)a_n, $$ where, once more, $g_k$ is smooth for $x \neq 0$ and satisfies $g_k(x) \to 0$ as $|x| \to +\infty$. Do you see how to show that all the derivatives of $f/P$ vanish quickly enough, using the quotient rule?