I have trouble understanding the following task:
Show that the set $X = \{f_1,\ldots ,f_6\}$ of functions $f_i : \Bbb Q\setminus \{0,1\} \to \Bbb Q\setminus \{0,1\}$ with
$x ↦ f_1(x) = x$,
$x ↦ f_2(x) = 1/x$,
$ x ↦ f_3(x) = 1-x,$
$x ↦ f_4(x) = 1/(1-x)$,
$ x ↦ f_5(x) = (x-1)/x$,
$x ↦ f_6(x) = x/(x-1)$
and the composition as the operation is a group. Is this group commutative?
I'm a little confused as I don't know what to do with all these functions. I can't apply the definitions of a group on this because of that. If the group is $(X,∘)$ how do I show that this is associative don't I need the information on how the single functions are connected or am I missing something?
First of all, composition of functions is always associative (in a way this is "the mother of all associativities"), because for all $x$ $$ ((f\circ g)\circ h)(x)=(f\circ g)(h(x))=f(g(h(x)))=f((g\circ h)(x))=(f\circ(g\circ h))(x).$$
Thus, what you need to show about your set $X$ of functions is
One can also try this the other way around: The set of bijections $\mathbb Q\setminus \{0,1\}\to\mathbb Q\setminus \{0,1\}$ is certainly a group $G$. If we start with $f_2,f_3\in G$, there is certainly a smallest subgroup $\langle f_2,f_3\rangle$ of $G$ that contains both $f_2$ and $f_3$. To find this group (noting that $f_2, f_3$ are their own inverses), we can simply keep playing with composing found functions with $f_2$ and $f_3$ until we no longer find new functions - a process that fortunately terminates and gives us exactly the set $X$.
Another interesting point to note is that all elements of $X$ have the form $f(x)=\frac{ax+b}{cx+d}$ with $ad-bc\ne0$ (where we ignore the fact that $f$ is not defined at $x-\frac dc$, say we view these as functions on $\mathbb R\setminus \mathbb Q$). This reminds us of invertible matrices $A=\begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}$ with $\det A=ad-bc\ne0$. Do you see how the composition of two fucntions of this "matrix type" relates to a well-known operation among the corrsponding matrices?