Sigma notation with indefinite limits

297 Views Asked by At

I would like to sum over a partial interval:

$$ \sum_{t = -k}^{0}\beta_{k}, $$

where $\beta$ could be any constant (e.g., $\beta = 5$). I want to express an additive sum from $-k$ to $0$. The negative constant in the lower limit is an arbitrary naming convention.

Question:

(1) Is it proper to call the $t$ a "variable" and $-k$ a constant? Should $\beta$ be $t$-subscripted?

  • The real "variable" is $t$, which is a dummy variable.
  • It is important to show this explicitly as some academic papers like to express outcomes of a linear equation before some event. I use the negative subscripts to explicitly denote the periods before exposure to some intervention.

(2) Could someone review what I have tried:

Assuming $\beta = 5$,

$$ \sum_{t = -k}^{0}5 = 5(0 - (-k) + 1) = 5(0 + k + 1) = 5k + 5, $$

and if $k=3$ (which is an arbitrary subscript), then the solution is:

$$ \sum_{t = -3}^{0}5 = 5(0 - (-3) + 1) = 5(0 + 3 + 1) = 5(4) = 20. $$

Any thoughts?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

2
On BEST ANSWER

Your work is mathematically correct.

Your answers for both examples are correct and clearly explained.

Someone may ask why do you use the index $k$ in $\beta _k$ if it is a constant.