if I have a matrix $X\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times d}$, and some projection matrix $P\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$ which projects things onto a $k$-dim subspace of the column space of $X$, is there some expression for the singular values of $PX$? Say WLOG that $\|X\|_{op}\leq1$. Using Weyl's inequality we get an upperbound that $\sigma_i(PX)\leq \sigma_i(X)$. But I suspect that this is too pessimistic since $P$ projects onto a subspace of $col(X)$. For example, if $PX=X_k$ being the SVD of the top $k$ singular values, then $\sigma_1(PX)\leq \sigma_{k+1}(X)$ which can be very small. Thanks for any advice!
2026-03-27 01:52:30.1774576350
Singular value of production of projection matrix and some other matrix
389 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in MATRIX-DECOMPOSITION
- Real eigenvalues of a non-symmetric matrix $A$ ?.
- Swapping row $n$ with row $m$ by using permutation matrix
- Block diagonalizing a Hermitian matrix
- $A \in M_n$ is reducible if and only if there is a permutation $i_1, ... , i_n$ of $1,... , n$
- Simplify $x^TA(AA^T+I)^{-1}A^Tx$
- Diagonalize real symmetric matrix
- How to solve for $L$ in $X = LL^T$?
- Q of the QR decomposition is an upper Hessenberg matrix
- Question involving orthogonal matrix and congruent matrices $P^{t}AP=I$
- Singular values by QR decomposition
Related Questions in SINGULAR-VALUES
- Singular Values of a rectangular matrix
- Connection between singular values, condition and well-posedness
- Does the product of singular values of a rectangular matrix have a simple expression?
- Clarification on the SVD of a complex matrix
- Intuitive explanation of the singular values
- What are the characteristics that we can use to identify polynomials that have singular points?
- Zolotarev number and commuting matrices
- Spectral norm of block and square matrices
- Why is the Schmidt decomposition of an operator not unique?
- Smallest singular value of full column rank matrix
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is a bit of reasoning, but not a final answer.
Proof : Write $P=\sum_{i=1}^k p_i\cdot p_i^T$ with $\{p_i\}_{i=1}^k$ an othonormal set of vectors. Then \begin{align*} PU&=\sum_{i=1}^k p_i\cdot (U^T p_i)^T\\ &=U\sum_{i=1}^k (U^T p_i)\cdot (U^T p_i)^T\\ &=U P' \end{align*}
It is clear from that, that we can essentially assume without loss of generality that $X$ is diagonal with positive values, indeed if $X=U \Sigma V^T$ then the question doesn't depend on $V$ and $PX=UP'\Sigma V$ where the relation between $P$ and $X$ translates equivalently to the identical relation on $\Sigma$ and $P'$. Note that the relation on $\Sigma$ and $P'$ is essentially just that $P'=\begin{bmatrix} P''&0\\0&0 \end{bmatrix}$ and $\Sigma=\begin{bmatrix} \Sigma'&0\\0&0\end{bmatrix}$ with similar shapes (the top left matrices are $p\times p$), therefore we can assume WLOG that $\Sigma$ is full rank and that $P''$ is any projection matrix. The question therefore becomes
Let's have some examples to browse for intuition. Write $\Sigma=\begin{bmatrix} \sigma_1&0&\cdots&0\\0&\sigma_2&\cdots&0\\\vdots&\vdots&\ddots&\vdots\\0&0&\cdots&\sigma_n \end{bmatrix}$ with $\sigma_1\geq \sigma_2\geq\dots\geq \sigma_n>0$.
The last example might be a bit misleading since it doesn't generalize to higher dimensions, it is not true that if $P=\sum_{p=1}^k u_i u_i^T$ then $u_i$ is a left singular vector of $P\Sigma$.
I can't quite finish the argument but I think this still gives a nice characterization of the extreme scenarios and a way to dive into a full characterization of all possible achievable sets of singular values for $P\Sigma$ and therefore for $PX$.