I have a system of equations that is used to predict a response. I know the answers and I am solving for the X and Ys to solve the equations. The problem is that I know that there will never be a perfect solution to the equations as they counteract each other, though I want the answers to give a value somewhat close to the actual answers. Any suggestions on ways to do that besides numerically just punching in numbers and seeing if they are close? Thanks!
2026-04-12 03:01:14.1775962874
Solving a System of Equation which wont give perfect answers
53 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in SYSTEMS-OF-EQUATIONS
- Can we find $n$ Pythagorean triples with a common leg for any $n$?
- System of equations with different exponents
- Is the calculated solution, if it exists, unique?
- System of simultaneous equations involving integral part (floor)
- Solving a system of two polynomial equations
- Find all possible solution in Z5 with linear system
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Constructing tangent spheres with centers located on vertices of an irregular tetrahedron
- Solve an equation with binary rotation and xor
- Existence of unique limit cycle for $r'=r(μ-r^2), \space θ' = ρ(r^2)$
Related Questions in APPROXIMATION
- Does approximation usually exclude equality?
- Approximate spline equation with Wolfram Mathematica
- Solving Equation with Euler's Number
- Approximate derivative in midpoint rule error with notation of Big O
- An inequality involving $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\sqrt{\sin x}\:dx $
- On the rate of convergence of the central limit theorem
- Is there any exponential function that can approximate $\frac{1}{x}$?
- Gamma distribution to normal approximation
- Product and Quotient Rule proof using linearisation
- Best approximation of a function out of a closed subset
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
instead of solving $A\vec{x} = \vec{b}$, you can solve the linear least squares formulation of the problem, $$ A^T A \vec{x} = A^t \vec{b}, $$ which is guaranteed to have the solution. In the geometric projection sense, that will be the closest possible answer to the true solution of the system.
Meaning to say, geometrically, the solutions of $A \vec{x} = \vec{b}$ are representations of $\vec{b}$ in the column space of $A$, which is not always possible. However, you can always orthogonally project $\vec{b}$ onto the column space of $A$ and the linear least squares problem will get you the corresponding solution.
A typical technique for doing this numerically is the singular-value decomposition.