Assuming $\hbar = 1$, $m = 1$ and $V$ only depends on $x$, the Schrodinger equations becomes: \begin{equation} \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial t}(x,t) = \frac{i} {2}(\nabla^2 + V(x))\Psi(x,t) \end{equation} Given $x_0$, define $f(t) = \Psi(x_0,t)$: \begin{equation} \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}(t) = F(t,f(t)) \end{equation} using aproximation for $\nabla^2$: \begin{equation} F(t,f)=\frac{i}{2} \left( \frac{\Psi(x_0+h_x,t)-2\Psi(x_0,t)+\Psi(x_0-h_x,t)}{h_x^2}- V(x_0)f \right) \end{equation} I want to find $f_n \approx \psi(x_0,t_0+nh_t) = \psi(x_0,t_n)$, given $f_0 = \psi(x_0,t_0)$, using $RK4$ define: \begin{align*} k_1 &= F(t_n,f_n) \\ k_2 &= F(t_n+\frac{h_t}{2},f_n+\frac{h_t}{2}k_1) \\ k_3 &= F(t_n+\frac{h_t}{2},f_n+\frac{h_t}{2}k_2) \\ k_4 &= F(t_n+h_t,f_n + h_tk_3) \end{align*} then: \begin{equation} f_{n+1} = f_n + \frac{h_t}{6}(k_1 + 2k_2 + 2k_3 + k_4) \end{equation} The problem is, to find let's say $k_4$ y need to know $\Psi(x_0,t_n+h_t) = f_{n+1}$, how can I apply $RK4$?
2026-03-25 11:08:54.1774436934
Solving time dependent schrodinger equation using RK4
408 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NUMERICAL-METHODS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- How to solve the exponential equation $e^{a+bx}+e^{c+dx}=1$?
- Is the calculated solution, if it exists, unique?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Minimum of the 2-norm
- Is method of exhaustion the same as numerical integration?
- Prove that Newton's Method is invariant under invertible linear transformations
- Initial Value Problem into Euler and Runge-Kutta scheme
- What are the possible ways to write an equation in $x=\phi(x)$ form for Iteration method?
- Numerical solution for a two dimensional third order nonlinear differential equation
Related Questions in QUANTUM-MECHANICS
- Is there a book on the purely mathematical version of perturbation theory?
- Matrix differential equation and matrix exponential
- "Good" Linear Combinations of a Perturbed Wave Function
- Necessary condition for Hermician lin operators
- What is a symplectic form of the rotation group SO(n)
- Why is $\textbf{J}$ called angular momentum?(Quantum)
- How does the quantumstate evolve?
- Differential equation $au''(x)+b\frac{u(x)}{x}+Eu=0$
- How to model this system of $^{238}\,U$ atoms?
- Discrete spectra of generators of compact Lie group
Related Questions in RUNGE-KUTTA-METHODS
- Sensitivity (gradient) of function solved using RK4
- Solve fourth order ODE using fourth order Runge-Kutta method
- Prove that Runge Kutta Method (RK4) is of Order 4
- Applying second-order differential operator vs applying first-order differential operator twice?
- Adaptive step size Runge Kutta: getting a specific value
- PYTHON RK2 (Midpoint Method)
- Runge-Kutta Order Question
- fourth-order Runge-Kutta method producing values for $f(x)=\int_0^x e^{-t^2}$ (confusing answer key)
- Adaptive Step Size in RK45 for Second-Order ODE
- Runge kutta method for order 4 for ODE x'=f(t)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You are mixing up notations. The RK4 method is explicit. You use $f_n+h_tk_3$ as approximation of the array $Ψ(x_j,t_n+h_t)$, $j=0,...,M$, where $x_j=x_0+jh_x$.
Also, your use of $x_0$ is obfuscating the complexity of the problem. You compute the approximations of $Ψ(x_j,t_n+h_t)$ where $x_j=x_0+jh_x$ all simultaneously, there is no way around this (esp. if $V$ is not constant, as then even the Fourier coefficients are coupled). Thus $$ F_j(t_n,f_n)=\frac{i}{2} \left( \frac{f_{n,j+1}-2f_{n,j}+f_{n,j-1}}{h_x^2}- V(x_j)f_j \right). $$ You might have to replace $V(x_j)f_j$ with some local average to fit the approximation model, for instance when starting from finite elements or some other Galerkin scheme.