What do you mean by the term strict part of a binary relation?
How can it be used to define minimal element for any set with relation?
2026-04-12 11:34:40.1775993680
Strict part of a relation
209 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ELEMENTARY-SET-THEORY
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Composition of functions - properties
- Existence of a denumerble partition.
- Why is surjectivity defined using $\exists$ rather than $\exists !$
- Show that $\omega^2+1$ is a prime number.
- A Convention of Set Builder Notation
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- Problem with Cartesian product and dimension for beginners
- Proof that a pair is injective and surjective
- Value of infinite product
Related Questions in ORDER-THEORY
- Some doubt about minimal antichain cover of poset.
- Partially ordered sets that has maximal element but no last element
- Ordered set and minimal element
- Order relation proof ...
- Lexicographical covering of boolean poset
- Every linearly-ordered real-parametrized family of asymptotic classes is nowhere dense?
- Is there a name for this property on a binary relation?
- Is the forgetful functor from $\mathbf{Poset}$ to $\mathbf{Set}$ represented by the object 2?
- Comparing orders induced by euclidean function and divisibility in euclidean domain
- Embedding from Rational Numbers to Ordered Field is Order Preserving
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It's hard to say without more context, but it seems like you are to take out pairs of the form $(x,x)$ from your relation (i.e. dropping the condition of reflexivity). This is similar to how "less than or equal to" gives rise to "strictly less than".
Given a strict relation, you can find a minimal element of a finite set by taking a descending chain $x_1 > x_2 > \cdots > x_n$. Since the set is finite, the chain will indeed terminate at a minimal element.
If the set is infinite, there may not be a minimal element under every relation. For example, in the real numbers with usual "less than" relation there can be descending chains with no minimal element.