Let $a,b,c,x,y,z>0$ and $x+ y+ z= 1$. Show that $$ax+ by+ cz\geq a^{x}.b^{y}.c^{z}$$ I have found the generalization of this inequality: For 2 sets of numbers $\left \{ a_{i} \right \}, \left \{ b_{i} \right \}> 0$ and $\sum_{1}^{n}b_{i}= 1$, we have: $$\sum_{1}^{n}\left ( a_{i}b_{i} \right )\geq \prod_{1}^{n}\left ( a_{i}^{b_{i}} \right )$$ First solution Simply compare the logs: as the natural logarithm is a concave function, one has $$\ln\bigl(a^x b^y c^z)=x\ln a+y\ln b+z\ln c\le \ln(ax+by+cz)$$ for all non-negative $x,y,z$ such that $x+y+z=1$. How about another solution? I really hope to see that. Thanks!
2026-03-25 22:06:22.1774476382
$\sum_{1}^{n}\left ( a_{i}b_{i} \right )\geq \prod_{1}^{n}\left ( a_{i}^{b_{i}} \right )$
116 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in INEQUALITY
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
- Show that $x\longmapsto \int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha }}dy$ is integrable.
- Solution to a hard inequality
- Is every finite descending sequence in [0,1] in convex hull of certain points?
- Bound for difference between arithmetic and geometric mean
- multiplying the integrands in an inequality of integrals with same limits
- How to prove that $\pi^{e^{\pi^e}}<e^{\pi^{e^{\pi}}}$
- Proving a small inequality
Related Questions in ALTERNATIVE-PROOF
- Are $[0,1]$ and $(0,1)$ homotopy equivalent?
- An isomorphism $f:G_1 \to G_2$ maps the identity of $G_1$ to the identity of $G_2$
- Simpler Derivation of $\sin \frac{\pi}{4} = \cos \frac{\pi}{4} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$,
- inequality with arc length integral
- In how many ways can the basketball be passed between four people so that the ball comes back to $A$ after seven passes? (Use recursion)
- Deriving the gradient of the Augmented Lagrangian dual
- An irreducible Markov chain cannot have an absorbing state
- Clarifying a proof that a certain set is an algebra
- Dilogarithmic fashion: the case $(p,q)=(3,4)$ of $\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\text{Li}_p(x)\,\text{Li}_q(x)}{x^2}\,dx$
- Proof by contrapositive: $x^4 + 2x^2 - 2x \lt 0 \Rightarrow 0 \lt x \lt 1$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Another way to prove it is starting with the AM-GM inequality: $$ \frac{1}{n}(x_1 + x_2 + \dots + x_n) \geq (x_1 x_2 \cdots x_n)^{\frac{1}{n}} $$ for all positive real numbers $x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n$.
Suppose that we have rational numbers $a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n$ such that $a_1 + a_2 + \dots + a_n = 1$, and some positive real numbers $x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n$. We will show that $$ a_1 x_1 + a_2 x_2 + \dots + a_n x_n \geq {x_1}^{a_1} {x_2}^{a_2} \cdots {x_n}^{a_n}, $$ and so your inequality holds when the weights are rational.
To see this, let $N$ be the least common multiple of the denominators of the $a_i$. Then we can write $$ a_i = \frac{m_i}{N} $$ for each $i$. The AM-GM inequality then tells us that
$$ a_1 x_1 + a_2 x_2 + \dots + a_n x_n = \frac{1}{N} (m_1 x_1 + m_2 x_2 + \dots + m_n x_n) = \frac{1}{N} (\overbrace{x_1 + x_1 + \dots + x_1}^{m_1 \text{ times}} + \overbrace{x_2 + x_2 + \dots + x_2}^{m_2 \text{ times}} + \dots + \overbrace{x_n + x_n + \dots + x_n}^{m_n \text{ times}}) \geq \left( {x_1}^{m_1} {x_2}^{m_2} \cdots {x_n}^{m_n} \right)^{\frac{1}{N}} = {x_1}^{a_1} {x_2}^{a_2} \cdots {x_n}^{a_n}. $$
We now extend the inequlity to all real weights by using a limiting argument.
Consider now any positive real numbers $a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n$ such that $a_1 + a_2 + \dots + a_n = 1$.
For each $i$ from $1$ to $n - 1$, we can find an increasing sequence of positive rational numbers $$ w_1^{(i)}, w_2^{(i)}, w_3^{(i)}, \dots $$ such that $$ \lim_{k \to \infty} w_k^{(i)} = a_i. $$
Let $$ w_k^{(n)} = 1 - w_k^{(1)} - w_k^{(2)} - \dots - w_{k}^{(n-1)} $$ for each $k$. Then for each $k$, we have that $w_k^{(n)}$ is also a positive rational number, and that $$ \lim_{k \to \infty} w_k^{(n)} = a_n. $$
Using our result from earlier, we know that for each $k$, we have that $$ w_k^{(1)} x_1 + w_k^{(2)} x_2 + \dots + w_k^{(n)} x_n \geq {x_1}^{w_k^{(1)}} {x_2}^{w_k^{(2)}} \cdots {x_n}^{w_k^{(n)}}. $$
Taking the limit as $k \to \infty$ then gives us that $$ a_1 x_1 + a_2 x_2 + \dots + a_n x_n \geq {x_1}^{a_1} {x_2}^{a_2} \cdots {x_n}^{a_n}. $$