Given a linear $(n,M,d)_q$ code, and its generator matrix $G$, I was wondering if there was a way to compute the sum of all the non-zero codevectors without computing every single one? Is there a quick way to do this?
2026-03-25 06:18:51.1774419531
Sum of codevectors of a linear code
452 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SUMMATION
- Computing:$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{3^n}{n!(n+3)}$
- Prove that $1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+...}}}}=\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+...}}}}$
- Fourier series. Find the sum $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2n+1}$
- Sigma (sum) Problem
- How to prove the inequality $\frac{1}{n}+\frac{1}{n+1}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2n-1}\geq \log (2)$?
- Double-exponential sum (maybe it telescopes?)
- Simplify $\prod_{k=1}^{l} \sum_{r=d}^m {{m}\choose{r}} \left(N-k \right)^{r} k^{m-r+1}$
- Sum of two martingales
- How can we prove that $e^{-jωn}$ converges at $0$ while n -> infinity?
- Interesting inequalities
Related Questions in CODING-THEORY
- Solving overdetermined linear systems in GF(2)
- Inverting a generator matrix - Coding Theory
- Probability of a block error of the (N, K) Hamming code used for a binary symmetric channel.
- How to decode a Hadamard message that was encoded using the inner product method?
- How to decode a Hadamard message that was encoded using a generator matrix?
- Find the two missing digits in 10-ISBN code
- Characterize ideals in $\mathbb{F}_l[x]/(x-1) \oplus \mathbb{F}_l[x]/(\frac{x^p-1}{x-1})$
- Number of codes with max codeword length over an alphabet
- Dimension of ASCII code
- Prove how many errors CRC code can detect
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
TL: DR version
For a linear $[n,k]_q$ code over the finite field $\mathbb F_q$, the sum of all the codewords is the all-zeroes codeword $\mathbf 0$ except when $q=2, k=1$ and the code has two distinct codewords, in which case the sum equals the (unique) nonzero binary codeword. (Thanks to @leonbloy for pointing out that I had missed this exceptional case).
The proof is based on the result that in each of the $n$ coordinate positions, the $q^k$ codewords either (i) all have value $0$, or (ii) for each $\alpha \in \mathbb F_q$, exactly $q^{k-1}$ codewords have value $\alpha$ in that coordinate position.
Fix the coordinate position under consideration, and let $\mathcal C(\alpha) \subset \mathcal C$ be the set of codewords that have value $\alpha \in\mathbb F_q$ in the chosen coordinate position. Note that $\mathcal C(0)$ is nonempty since at least one codeword ($\mathbf 0$, of course!) is known to have value $0$ in the chosen position; there may be other codewords too that enjoy this property. Now, if $\mathcal C(0) = \mathcal C$, that is, all the codewords have value $0$ in the chosen coordinate position, then the sum of all the codewords (which is a codeword) also has value $0$ in the chosen position. Note that the assumption $\mathcal C(0) = \mathcal C$ implies that $\mathcal C(\alpha) = \emptyset$ for all nonzero $\alpha \in \mathbb F_q$.
Now suppose that there is a codeword $\mathbf C^{\beta)}$ that has nonzero value $\beta \in \mathbb F_q$ in the chosen position, and consider the set of codewords $\{\mathbf C^{\beta)}+\mathbf C \colon \mathbf C \in \mathcal C(0)\}$. Each of these $\big|\mathcal C(0)\big|$ codewords has value $\beta+0 = \beta$ in the chosen coordinate position and thus is a member of $\mathcal C(\beta)$. Of course, one of the codewords in $\{\mathbf C^{\beta)}+\mathbf C \colon \mathbf C \in \mathcal C(0)\}$ is $\mathbf C^{(\beta)} + \mathbf 0 = \mathbf C^{(\beta)}$ itself. We conclude that $\{\mathbf C^{\beta)}+\mathbf C \colon \mathbf C \in \mathcal C(0)\}$ is a subset of $\mathcal C(\beta)$ and that $$\big|\{\mathbf C^{\beta)}+\mathbf C \colon \mathbf C \in \mathcal C(0)\}\big| =\big|\mathcal C(0)\big| \leq \big|\mathcal C(\beta)\big|. \tag{1}$$ Conversely, every one of the $\big|\mathcal C(\beta)\big|$ codewords in $\{\mathbf C^{\beta)}-\mathbf C^\prime \colon \mathbf C^\prime \in \mathcal C(\beta)\}$ is a codeword in $\mathcal C(0)$, one of them being $\mathbf C^{\beta)}-\mathbf C^{\beta)} = \mathbf 0$. Thus, $\{\mathbf C^{\beta)}-\mathbf C^\prime \colon \mathbf C^\prime \in \mathcal C(\beta)\} \subset \mathcal C(0)$ and we have that $$\big|\{\mathbf C^{\beta)}+\mathbf C^\prime \colon \mathbf C^\prime \in \mathcal C(\beta)\}\big| =\big|\mathcal C(\beta)\big| \leq \big|\mathcal C(0)\big|. \tag{2}$$ From $(1)$ and $(2)$ we have that $$\big|\mathcal C(\beta)\big| = \big|\mathcal C(0)\big|. \tag{3}$$ Next, note that since the code is linear, for each nonzero $\alpha \in \mathbb F_q$, the scalar multiple $(\alpha\beta^{-1})\mathbf C^{(\beta)}$ of $\mathbf C^{(\beta)}$ is a codeword $\mathbf C^{(\alpha)}$ that has value $\alpha$ in the chosen position. A repetition of the above argument shows that $\big|\mathcal C(\alpha)\big|$ also equals $\big|\mathcal C(0)\big|.$ In short, all $q$ subsets $\mathcal C(\alpha), \alpha \in \mathbb F_q$, have the same cardinality and we conclude that for each $\alpha \in \mathbb F_q$, exactly $q^{k-1}$ codewords have value $\alpha$ in the chosen position, as claimed above.
It follows that the sum of all $q^k$ codewords has value $$\sum_{\alpha \in \mathbb F_q} (\underbrace{\alpha + \alpha + \cdots + \alpha)}_{q^{k-1}~\text{terms}}\tag{4}$$ in the chosen position. Now,
If $k \geq 2$, the number of terms in each summand in $(4)$ is a multiple of $q$ and hence of $p$, the characteristic of the field. Consequently, each summand has value $0$ and so does the sum in $(4)$ have value $0$.
If $k = 1$, each summand in $(4)$ has value $\alpha$ and so $(4)$ is just the sum of all the elements of $\mathbb F_q$. Now, the elements of $F_q$ are the roots of the polynomial $x^q - x \in \mathbb F_q[x]$. The sum of the roots is the negative of the coefficient of $x^{q-1}$ in $x^q - x$ which coefficient is readily perceived to be $0$ when $q > 2$ and to have value $-1$ when $q=2$. In summary,