The memory that I considered this question a long time ago was jogged by my perusing an earlier one about whether a product is always greater than a sum.
If you have two sequences of real positive numbers, all greater than 1, and each sequence increasing with increasing index $k$
$$a_k , k \in {0 ... n}$$
&
$$b_k , k \in {0 ... n} , $$
and if the elements are multiplied together itemwise & the products summed, is the maximum always
$\sum_{k=0}^n a_k b_k$
and the minimum always
$\sum_{k=0}^n a_k b_{n-k}$?
It would seem so, merely casting it in the mind ... but I can't see how it would be rigorously proven ... nor am I absolutely sure it's absolutely true, either.
First consider the simplest nontrivial case, $n=2$. Let $a_1>a_0$ and $b_1>b_0$. Then $(a_1-a_0)(b_1-b_0)>0$, which simplifies to $a_0b_0+a_1b_1>a_0b_1+a_1b_0$, which is what we want.
Now let $n>2$. Without loss of generality, fix $a$ in its sorted permutation and consider permutations of $b$. If $b$ is not sorted, then there are two indices that are out of order, and the $n=2$ lemma proves that we can increase the product by swapping those two indices. Therefore only the sorted order of $b$ maximizes the product. For the same reason, only the anti-sorted order of $b$ minimizes the product.
(You could toss a bunch of index notation at the previous paragraph to make it look more formal.)