I would like to know if there is an elementary proof (without Galois theory, i.e. using the fact that conjugates are images by the base field automorphisms) of the fact that the conjugates of a sum of two algebraic numbers $x+y$ are the $x'+y'$ with $x'$ conjugate to $x$ and $y'$ conjugate to $y$. (If need be, restricting to $\mathbb{Q}$ is perfectly fine)
2026-04-07 12:06:24.1775563584
Sums of conjugates of algebraic numbers
222 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GALOIS-THEORY
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- A weird automorphism
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- Question about existence of Galois extension
- Prove that K/L is a Galois extension
- discriminant and irreducibility of $x^p - (p+1)x - 1$
- galois group of irreducible monic cubic polynomial
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
- Regular inverse Galois problem for Q(t)
- When a certain subfield of $\mathbb{C}(x,y^2)$ is Galois
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $f,g$ be polynomials $\in K[X]$ of degrees $n,m$ and let $x_1,\ldots,x_n$ and $y_1,\ldots y_m$ be their roots. Let $h\in K[X,Y]$ and $z_{i,j}=h(x_i,y_j)$. Thne the elementary symmetric polynomials in the $nm$ numbers $z_{i,j}$ are symmetric polynomials in the $x_i$ with coefficients from $K[y_1,\ldots, y_m]$ and these coefficient-polynomials themselves symmetric in the $y_j$. Hence the coefficient-polynomials can be expressed in therms of the elementary symmetric polynomials in the $y_j$, i.e., in terms of the coefficients of $g$. But then the $z_{i,j}$ are symmetric polynomials in the $x_i$ with coefficients in $K$, which means they can be expressed in terms of the coefficients of $f$, so are ultimately $\in K$. Ultimately, this gives us the coefficients $\in K$ for a polynomial with all $h(x_i,y_j)$ as its roots. The irreducible factor of that polynomial that happens to have $h(x_1,y_1)$ among its roots, say, has all its other roots also of the form $h(x_i,y_j)$, as was to be shown (in your specific question, for $h(X,Y)=X+Y$).