Have a look at the syntax diagram for the escape language:
I read the second set of transitions as follows:
The state transitioned to by the
\symbol can transition to the accepting state if the next symbol is not in the newline or hex digit languages (or in other words, is in any language but the newline or hex digit languages).
The state transitioned to by the\symbol can transition to a different state if the next symbol is in hex digit language.
Isn't this contradictory?
First off, there is no contradiction in the fact that different symbols lead to distinct states in an automaton. That is the very nature of these devices. So your two assertions do not bear any contradiction.
However, they do not really capture the referenced diagram.
After this, the next symbol will take you out of this part of the diagram to whatever part is entered at the exit point on the right hand side.
While this diagram is similar to a finite automaton, it is really something a little different.