Let $E \subset \mathbb{R}$ be a measurable set with $0 < |E| < \infty$. Does there exist a closed interval $T$ with positive measure such that $|T\cap E| = |T|$. ($|E|$ denotes the measure of the set $E$.)
2026-03-30 19:02:20.1774897340
$|T\cap E| = |T|$ for closed set $T$ and measurable set $E$
58 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in BOREL-SETS
- Prove an assertion for a measure $\mu$ with $\mu (A+h)=\mu (A)$
- $\sigma$-algebra generated by a subset of a set
- Are sets of point convergence of Borel functions Borel?
- Can anyone give me an example of a measurable subset of the interval [10,100], that is not a Borel set.
- If $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ satisfies $m^\ast(A) = 0$, then there exist $B, C ∈ \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})$ such that $A = B \setminus C$?
- Why is the sigma algebra generated by the set of all closed subsets a subset of the Borel sigma algebra on $\mathbb{R}$?
- Permutation of binary expansion on (0,1)
- Kernel of finitely additive function on $\mathbf{N}$ and Borel sets
- Induced Borel $\sigma$-algebra.
- Does set with Lebesgue-Mass nonzero have almost surely an open subset
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
In the following, I presume 'measure' refers to the Lebesgue measure. The questions asked in the title and body are different, and have correspondingly different answers. It is quite easy if you just want to find a closed set with this property: by inner regularity of the Lebesgue measure, $E$ has a compact subset $K$ with positive measure, therefore $0<|K|=|K\cap E|$ and you are done. If however you want to find a closed interval, then in general it cannot be done. The following is one such counterexample:
Let $K = \cap_n K_n$ be a fat Cantor set, where $K_0 = [0,1]$, $K_1 = [0,\frac{3}{8}] \cup [\frac{5}{8},1]$, and in general $K_{n+1}$ is formed by removing the middle $\frac{1}{4^{n+1}}$ interval of each of the $2^{n}$ subintervals of $K_n$. $K$ is compact hence measurable, and has measure $1-\sum_{n\geq 0} \frac{2^n}{4^{n+1}} = \frac{1}{2}$. If $A=[a,b]$ is a closed interval, then $A\cap K \subset A\cap K_n$ for each $n$. Convince yourself that for $n$ sufficiently large, there is some sub-interval of $K_n$ whose endpoints lie in $A$, in which case $K_{n+1}$ removes an interval in $A$, so $|A\cap K| \leq |A\cap K_{n+1}|<|A|$, hence $|A|\neq|A\cap K|$.