What exactly is a Tangent vector to a geodesic? I see this term is used often but I just can't find a definition for that.
2026-03-25 11:09:49.1774436989
Tangent vector to a geodesic
1.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in GEODESIC
- Length of geodesic line equals distance between two points?
- What's the relation between the Darboux Frame and the Frenet-Serret on a oriented surface?
- Projection from an ellipsoid onto a sphere that preserves geodesy?
- Vector field on a geodesic
- Geodesic lines of the form f(at+b)
- How to actually find a minimizing path on a manifold?
- Calculating the round metric on $S^n$
- Geodesic equation on a codimension 1 submanifold of $\mathbb{R^{n+1}}$
- How can you numerically approximate the geodesic midpoint of 2 points on an ellipsoids?
- Compute geodesic circles on a Surface
Related Questions in SEMI-RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- Do pp-wave spacetimes have a well-defined signature/index?
- Can the Gram-Schmidt algorithm be extended to construct a basis for $T_p M$ of a semi-Riemannian manifold?
- Does a coordinate chart have a smooth orthonormal frame w.r.t. a semi-Riemannian metric?
- Is there a coordinate free proof for this result?
- Making sense of $2{\rm grad}(\langle H,H\rangle) + 4 {\rm trace}(A_{DH}) = 0$
- Points fixed by the isotropy group of the restricted Poincaré group in Minkowski space
- The equivalence of two definitions of Cauchy surfaces.
- How to solve a second ODE involving the Lorentzian function, possibly using analytical methods?
- Definition of a metric tensor in Barrett O'Neil's book
- Lorentz transformations in matrix form (Matrix Multiplication problem)
Related Questions in TANGENT-SPACES
- Tangent space of smooth manifold $M=\{(x,x^3,e^{x-1}) : x \in \Bbb{R}\}$ at $(1,1,1)$
- Calculating the tangent space of an ellipsoid
- How does this equality come between a point in $\mathbb R^n$ and combination of operators?
- What is the motivation of creating of $T^*_p(\mathbb R^n)?$ How can we visualize covectors?
- Tangent space of $S^1$
- Can a basis of a tangent space be mapped to a basis of another tangent space if the map between the spaces is a homeomorphism and vice versa?
- Formula for tangent map, proof check
- Tangent space basis of $S^3 \times S^3$
- Why $T_{A}M(n) = M(n)$ and why $T_{f(A)}S(n) = S(n)$ and why $M(n)$ & $S(n)$ are manifolds. (Guillemin & Pollack p.23)
- Definition of derivatives on vector fields on manifolds
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

I am afraid this is a purely notational problem; notation is, as you may already know, sometimes a tricky issue in geometry and related fields. Apologies in advance if it feels like I am going round the houses in my answer.
The first paragraph defines the exponential map at a point $p\in\Sigma$ as $$\exp:(-\epsilon,\epsilon)\times \Sigma\to M;\, (r,p)\mapsto c_p(r). $$
This gives us, for each point $p$ in $\Sigma$ a path $c_p(r)$ that passes through $p$ and is contained in $\Sigma$. That path has one parameter ($r$), which ranges from $-\epsilon$ to $\epsilon$. The vector field $\frac{\partial}{\partial r}$, when applied to a point $c_p(r_0)$ gives us a vector tangent to $c_p(r_0)$.
Let me rephrase what we know so far: $c_p(\cdot)$ is, as the first paragraph says, a null geodesic. The vector field $\frac{\partial}{\partial r}$, when applied to a point on the geodesic line, will give us a vector that is tangent to the geodesic. That is the reason why we can speak of $\frac{\partial}{\partial r}$ as a vector tangent to the geodesic.
With regards to the 'null' part, that only means that the vector is lightlike, i.e. that $g_{rr} = 0$. You can find more about space-, time-, and lightlike vectors on Wikipedia, and probably on your book.