The simple question is: what is the correct way to calculate the series expansion of $\arctan(x+2)$ at $x=\infty$ without strange (and maybe wrong) tricks?
Read further only if you want more details.
The first (obvious) problem is that infinite is not a number, thus $\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{f^{(k)}(\infty)}{k!}(x-\infty)^k$ doesn't make sense.
So I've tried to solve $\lim_{x_0\to \infty} ({\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{f^{(k)}(x_0)}{k!}(x-x_0)^k})$ one term at a time. The first term (with $k=0$) can be easily calculated and the second term is: $$\lim_{x_0\to \infty} (\frac{x-x_0}{1+(x_0+4x_0+4)} \sim -\frac{x_0}{x_0^2}=\frac{-1}{x_0}) = 0$$
The asymptotic function $\frac{-1}{x_0}$ is similar to what I should get as the second term (which is $\frac{-1}{x}$). But to get the correct result I should do some dangerous stuff: I should replace $x_0$ with $x$ (why?) and do not calculate the limit (otherwise I cannot get the desired precision of the series expansion).
I've also tried to solve $\arctan(1/t+2)$ with $t=0$, but the argument of arctg is still an infinite and the difficulties I encounter are the same.
Is there any way to calculate the series expansion of $\arctan(x+2)$ at $x=\infty$ in a cleaner way without all these problems?
Substituting $x=\frac 1t$ and expanding around $t=0$ is the correct thing to do. The first derivative of $\tan^{-1}(\frac{1}{t}+2)$ is, by the chain rule $$ -\frac{1}{t^2}\frac{1}{(\frac 1t +2)^2} = -\frac{1}{(1+2t)^2}~, $$ which is perfectly finite at $t=0$. The same goes for all the other derivatives.
After you construct your Taylor expansion, just replace $t$ with $\frac 1x$.
Edit: Perhaps the zeroth-order term concerned you. Although the argument does indeed become singular, $\tan^{-1}(1/t)$ is well-behaved as $t\to 0^+$; it just approaches $\pi/2$. So this is the zeroth-order term for your expansion.
Edit 2: Marc Palm correctly points out in his short answer that the Taylor series does not converge (one easy way to see this is that $\tan^{-1}$ approaches different values at $x \to \pm \infty$, but these both correspond to $t\to 0$, so the function cannot be analytic there; this is why I wrote $t\to 0^+$ above). However, the procedure above still gives you a sensible expansion to some finite order, with error bounded by Taylor's theorem.