Let $f\in S$ with $S= \left\{ {f:\mathbb{R} \to \left[ {0, + \infty } \right):\int_{ - \infty }^{+\infty} {{{\left| {\hat f\left( t \right)} \right|}^2}{{\left( {1 + {{\left| t \right|}^2}} \right)}^s}dt \leqslant C} } \right\}$, where $a>\frac{1}{2}$, $C>0$, and $\hat f$ is the Fourier transform of $f$ as usual. In a paper which I have read, the authors said that any function $f\in S$ is bounded continuous on $\mathbb{R}$. I am trying to prove this statement. I see that the boundness of $f$ from the class $S$ can be deduced from the fact that $$\left| {f\left( x \right)} \right| = \left| {\frac{1}{{2\pi }}\int_{ - \infty }^\infty {{e^{itx}}\hat f\left( t \right)dt} } \right| \leqslant \int_{ - \infty }^\infty {\left| {\hat f\left( t \right)} \right|dt} = {\left\| {\hat f} \right\|_{{L^1}\left( \mathbb{R} \right)}}\leqslant const.$$ However, the equality ${f\left( x \right) = \frac{1}{{2\pi }}\int_{ - \infty }^\infty {{e^{itx}}\hat f\left( t \right)dt} }$ is just hold if $x$ is a continuity point of $f$. Therefore, I focused on proving the continuity of $f$ when $f\in S$. So far I have not found a proof for the statement. My question: How to prove $f$ is continous on $\mathbb{R}$ when $f\in S$? Can someone help me?
2026-04-08 07:13:15.1775632395
The continous of a function in the Sobolev class
60 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
By the way, you have a typo, but I know what you mean: You have an exponent $s$ on $(1+|s|^{2})$, but then you refer to $\alpha > 1/2$. I assume $\alpha=s$ was meant.
If $f=g$ a.e. on $\mathbb{R}$, then $f\in S$ iff $g \in S$, even though one may be unbounded and the other not. What they mean is that there is a continuous function $g$ such that $g=f$ a.e.. If that's not what they mean, then the statement of the problem is wrong because changing $f$ arbitrarily on a set of measure $0$ does not affect the Fourier transform.
You have basically proved the result because $\hat{f} \in L^{1}$ implies $g(t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{itx}\hat{f}(t)\,dt$ is continuous by the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem, and $g=f$ a.e..