In multivariate normal distribution, $X\sim N(\mu,\Sigma)$, where $\mu\in \mathbb{R}^p,~\Sigma \in\mathbb{R}^{p\times p},~ \Sigma \succ0\text{ and }\Sigma$ is symmetric. My professor told me that the dimension of the parameters space is $p+{p+1 \choose 2}$. I know the dimension of $\mu$ is $p$, but I don't know where does the ${p+1 \choose 2}$ come from.
2026-03-28 20:11:41.1774728701
The dimension of the parameter space of multivariate normal distribution?
534 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in STATISTICS
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- Statistics based on empirical distribution
- Given $U,V \sim R(0,1)$. Determine covariance between $X = UV$ and $V$
- Fisher information of sufficient statistic
- Solving Equation with Euler's Number
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- KL divergence between two multivariate Bernoulli distribution
- Given random variables $(T_1,T_2)$. Show that $T_1$ and $T_2$ are independent and exponentially distributed if..
- Probability of tossing marbles,covariance
Related Questions in NORMAL-DISTRIBUTION
- Expectation involving bivariate standard normal distribution
- How to get a joint distribution from two conditional distributions?
- Identity related to Brownian motion
- What's the distribution of a noncentral chi squared variable plus a constant?
- Show joint cdf is continuous
- Gamma distribution to normal approximation
- How to derive $E(XX^T)$?
- $\{ X_{i} \}_{i=1}^{n} \thicksim iid N(\theta, 1)$. What is distribution of $X_{2} - X_{1}$?
- Lindeberg condition fails, but a CLT still applies
- Estimating a normal distribution
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You have $\mu\in\mathbb R^p$ and $\Sigma\in \mathbb R^{p\times p}$ and $\Sigma$ is symmetric.
If there were no other constraints on the parameter space that would give you the number of scalar components of $\mu,$ which is $p,$ plus the number of scalar entries on or above the diagonal of $\Sigma$ (since those below the diagonal are completely determined by those above. The number on the diagonal is $p.$ The number above the diagonal is $\dbinom p 2,$ since you have to choose one of the $p$ rows and one of the $p$ columns, and they can't both have the same index, so you have to choose two of $1,\ldots, p.$ That means you have $$ p + p + \binom p 2. $$ And then $$ p + \binom p 2 = p + \frac{p(p-1)} 2 = \frac{2p}2 + \frac{p^2-p} 2 = \frac{p(p+1)} 2 = \binom {p+1} 2. $$ The subtler part is showing that the constraint that $\Sigma$ must be nonnegative-definite does not further reduce the dimension.
That can be shown by induction on $p$ if you know a certain trick, described in this posting.
PS: I suppose it should also be mentioned that every nonnegative-definite matrix is the variance of some random vector. Thus the constraint that $\Sigma$ must be such a variance does not diminish the parameter space beyond saying $\Sigma$ must be nonnegative-definite. This "every" can be deduced from the finite-dimensional version of the spectral theorem.