Can you provide proof for "The Fourier transform preserves norms for a square-integrable function"?
2026-04-24 19:18:37.1777058317
The fourier transform preserves norms for a square-integrable function proof
429 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Related Questions in NORMED-SPACES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Closure and Subsets of Normed Vector Spaces
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Minimum of the 2-norm
- Show that $\Phi$ is a contraction with a maximum norm.
- Understanding the essential range
- Mean value theorem for functions from $\mathbb R^n \to \mathbb R^n$
- Metric on a linear space is induced by norm if and only if the metric is homogeneous and translation invariant
- Gradient of integral of vector norm
Related Questions in FOURIER-TRANSFORM
- Proof of Fourier transform of cos$2\pi ft$
- Find the convergence of series of a sequence of functions in $L^2(\mathbb{R})$
- solving a simple ODE with Fourier transform
- How can we prove that $e^{-jωn}$ converges at $0$ while n -> infinity?
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Arcsin of a number greater than one
- Complex numbers in programming
- Power spectrum of field over an arbitrarily-shaped country
- Computing an inverse Fourier Transform / Solving the free particle Schrödinger equation with a gaussian wave packet as initial condition
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The Schwartz functions are dense in $L^2$: because for $f\in L^2$ for $T$ large $\|f-f 1_{[T,-T]}\|_2$ is small and for $n$ large $\|f 1_{[T,-T]}-n e^{-\pi n^2 x^2}\ast f 1_{[T,-T]}\|_2$ is small ($\ast$ is the convolution).
The finite linear combination of Gaussian functions $e^{-a (x+b)^2+icx}$ are dense in the Schwartz functions thus in $L^2$ (do a convolution with $n e^{-\pi n^2 x^2}$ again and approximate the Riemann integral by a Riemann sum)
For such a finite linear combination of Gaussians functions let $(Wg)(y)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2i\pi xy}g(x)dx,(W^* g)(y)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{2i\pi xy}g(x)dx$, the known Fourier transform of the Gaussian gives that $W^* Wg =g$. Also it is easily seen that $\langle Wg,h\rangle=\langle g,W^*h\rangle$ thus $$\|Wg\|_2^2=\langle Wg,Wg\rangle=\langle g,W^* Wg\rangle=\langle g,g\rangle = \|g\|_2^2$$
Take a sequence $g_n$ of such finite linear combination of Gaussians such that $\|f-g_n\|_2\to 0$ then its Fourier transform $Wf$ is defined as the limit in $L^2$ of the sequence $Wg_n$ (which is Cauchy by the previous result) so it is by definition that $\|f\|_2=\|Wf\|_2$.
It works the same way when replacing the Gaussians by any kind of functions for which you proved the Fourier inversion theorem (for example the functions such that $h,h'\in C^0\cap L^1$, from the Dirichlet kernel).