I am only broadly familiar with mathematics, so please have patience with me. I am wondering about the consistency of both the (a) Goldbach Conjecture and (b) its negation. If the Goldbach Conjecture would be decided, then would we see that (a) or (b) entailed/contained a contradiction on its own, or only that there would be a contradiction of either (a) or (b) together with some other mathematical axioms?
2026-03-25 20:35:24.1774470924
The Goldbach Conjecture, its negation and consistency
362 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GOLDBACHS-CONJECTURE
- Landau's comment on validity of Goldbach's conjecture
- Goldbach's Conjecture and 1-1 correspondence
- Calculating probability of being $m$ and $(n-m)$ both prime in Goldbach conjecture
- Are there any counterexamples to a generalized Goldbach conjecture?
- Why Goldbach Conjecture is difficult to solve in $\mathbb{R}[x]$ and $\mathbb{C}[x]$?
- Decomposition $2^k$ into a sum of primes
- Lower bound for $g(n)$, the number of decompositions of 2n into ordered sums of two odd primes
- $O(1)$ algorithm for Goldbach partitions, assuming $\pi(n)$ is known for all $0<n<2n$?
- Why can't we prove Goldbach's conjecture with this method?
- Every integer greater than $0$ can be expressed as a sum of $a$'s and $b$'s, if and only if $a$ and $b$ have no common factor
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If the Goldbach conjecture were proved, then of course it would be proved based on a certain set of axioms (such as Peano arithmetic, or maybe ZFC set theory) and the negation of the proven result would therefore be in contradiction with the axioms used. Also note that, in principle, a positive proof of Goldbach might involve more theory, but a disproof of Goldbach would ultimately boil down to exhibiting an even number not representable as sum of primes, i.e., something that could be verified "simply" by means of finitely many additions and multiplications of natural numbers.