I'm trying to do exercise 9 of section 15.5 in the book Abstract Algebra written by Dummit and Foote, whose aim is to establish a homeomorphic map between the elements in the fiber over $(p)$ of the Zariski continuous map from $\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{Z} [x])$ to $\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{Z})$ and the elements in $\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{Z} [x] \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} \mathbb{F}_p)$. But I don't know what does the prime ideals of $\mathbb{Z} [x] \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} \mathbb{F}_p$ looks like since it's the first time for me to study the primes in a tensor product.
Or generally speaking, given two rings $A$ and $B$, since a ring can be considered as a $\mathbb{Z}$-algebra, so the tensor product $A \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} B$ of $\mathbb{Z}$-algebras $A$ and $B$ is also a ring. And what is the elements of $\mathrm{Spec}(A \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} B)$ look like?
For variety, here's a geometric argument.
The contravariant $\operatorname{Spec}$ functor sends colimits of rings to limits of schemes. In the category of rings, $\otimes_R$ is the pushout over $R$; in particular, there is a pushout square
$$ \begin{matrix} \mathbb{Z} &\to& \mathbb{Z}[x] \\ \downarrow & & \downarrow \\ \mathbb{F}_p &\to& \mathbb{Z}[x] \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} \mathbb{F}_p \end{matrix} $$
Since $\mathbb{Z}$ is the initial ring, this is equivalent to saying that $\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}$ is the coproduct, so that $\mathbb{Z}[x] \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} \mathbb{F}_p$ is the coproduct of the rings $\mathbb{F}_p$ and $\mathbb{Z}[x]$.
So, in terms of schemes, this means
$$\begin{align} \operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}[x] \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} \mathbb{F}_p) &\cong \operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}[x]) \times_{\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{Z})} \operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{F}_p) \\&\cong \operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}[x]) \times\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{F}_p) \end{align}$$
Since $\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{F}_p)$ is a subscheme of $\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{Z})$, this means the fiber product is just the subscheme of $\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}[x])$ that lies over $\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{F}_p)$.
It may not be clear that this description actually translates to the expected description on points. But by the definition of pullback, it follows that the following are equivalent:
Thus, the points of $\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}[x] \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} \mathbb{F}_p)$ really are the points of $\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}[x])$ whose image in $\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{Z})$ is the image of $\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{F}_p)$.