The right way of proving LHS = RHS

10.2k Views Asked by At

I'm currently brushing up on my math before heading back to school for my bachelor's and am practicing on some questions.

Given the following equation :

$$\frac{x^2 - 3x}{x^2 - 9} = 1-\frac{3x-9}{x^2-9}.$$

and that I have to prove that the LHS = RHS; How would I go about doing so?

What I've done:

I've simply brought $(3x-9)/(x^2-9)$ over to the LHS, resulting in the equation $(x^2 - 3x)/(x^2-9) + (3x-9)/(x^2-9) = 1$ , which gives me $(x^2-9)/(x^2-9) = 1$.(LHS = RHS)

However, I do not think that what I've done is the correct method of proving. Should I have instead transformed the LHS into RHS without bringing anything from LHS to RHS and vice versa?

Furthermore , after which I'm integrating $(x^2-3x)/(x^2-9)$ by doing the following:

What I first did was factorise the denominator into $(x+3)(x-3)$. I then equated $(x^2 - 3x) = A(x + 3) + B(x - 3)$.

Given that $x = 3 \implies A = 0$ and given that $x = -3 \implies B = -3$.

This would then give me the following equation to integrate:

$[ (-3)/(x+3) + 0(x-3) ]dx$

which led me to the answer $-3ln|x+3| + C$.

However, when I checked my answer, the correct answer should be

$$x -3ln|x+3| + C.$$

Where did the missing $x$ come from?

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated

Thanks!

2

There are 2 best solutions below

1
On BEST ANSWER

First, to show the desired equality, we have: $$\frac{x^2-3x}{x^2-9}=\frac{x^2-9-3x+9}{x^2-9}=\frac{x^2-9}{x^2-9}-\frac{3x-9}{x^2-9}=1-\frac{3x-9}{x^2-9}.$$

Now, assuming that you are trying to find the integral of $\dfrac{x^2-3x}{x^2-9}$, we have: \begin{align} \int{\dfrac{x^2-3x}{x^2-9}dx}&=\int\left({1-\dfrac{3x-9}{x^2-9}}\right)dx \\ &=\int{\left(1-3\cdot\frac{x-3}{(x-3)(x+3)}\right)dx} \\ &=\int{dx}-3\int{\frac{1}{x+3}dx} \\ &=x-3\ln|x+3|+C. \end{align}

0
On

I've simply brought $(3x−9)/(x^2−9)$ over to the LHS,...

By so doing you have already assumed the equality of the two sides. When proving an alleged equality, one has access to only one side, not both - the other side should pop out from the proof.


As for the rest, its integration via partial fractions, which I think you were on the right track.