(a) $T(n) = 3T \left ( \frac{n}{2} + 1 \right ) + n$
(b) $T(n) = 4T \left ( \frac{n}{2} \right ) - 4 T \left ( \frac{n}{4} \right ) + 1$
I am really stuck on these two recurrences and finding out their answers in $\Theta$-notation.
For a) I have tried writing it as one fraction and trying to write the recurrence in terms of $K$ but I can't seem to find the right pattern and I have tried somehow using master's theorem but don't know how I could apply it.
For b) I have tried the substitution $k=n/2$, writing $T(n/4)$ in terms of $T(n/2)$ and trying to solve it that way to find a series to simplify somehow but I just don't seem to be getting it.
Both of these recurrences can be solved using the Akra-Bazzi Method. In both cases you should check that all the assumptions are satisfied.
Now for problem (a) we need to solve $3 \cdot \left ( \frac{1}{2} \right )^p = 1$, so that $p = \log_2(3)$. Then Akra-Bazzi promises that
$$ \begin{align} T(x) &= \Theta \left ( x^p \cdot \left ( 1 + \int_1^x \frac{u}{u^{1+p}} \ du \right ) \right ) \\ &= \Theta \left ( x^p \cdot \left ( 1 + \frac{x^{1-p}}{1-p} \right ) \right ) \\ &= \Theta \left ( x^p \right ) \\ &= \Theta \left ( x^{\log_2(3)} \right ) \end{align} $$
and this agrees with wolframalpha. Note we could have also heuristically done this computation by guessing that $\frac{n}{2} + 1 \approx \frac{n}{2}$, and then using simpler techniques, such as the tree method or the master theorem.
For problem (b) we'll use a common trick: Write $n = 2^k$. The the relation becomes
$$S(k) = 4S(k-1) - 4S(k-2) + 1$$
which is "just" a linear recurrence, which we can solve by any number of standard techniques, such as generating functions. For us, we see that $S(k) = \Theta \left ( k 2^k \right )$, which (remembering $n = 2^k$ so that $k = \log_2(n)$) gives us $T(n) = \Theta(n \log n)$. This, again, agrees with wolframalpha.
I hope this helps ^_^