. Given $\lim_{a_n} = a, \lim{b_n} = b$ Given two sequences such that $a_n \leq b_n$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$, then $a \leq b$
Assume : $a > b$ Take $$\epsilon = \frac{a-b}{4}$$. so there exists $N_1$ and $N_2$ such that so then $$a_n \in (\frac{3a+4}{4}, a+\epsilon), b_n \in (b_n-\epsilon, \frac{a+3b}{4})$$
Take $N = \operatorname{max} (N_1, N_2)$ so that we have $a_N \geq b_N$. but this is contradiction.
I am not sure if this is correct way to do this. only idea i have is to take disjoint intervels
Response given per the specific request of the OP (i.e. original poster).
Assume $~a > b,~$ and then derive a contradiction.
Let $~\epsilon~$ denote $~\dfrac{a-b}{4} \implies \epsilon > 0.$
Then, per the constraints of the problem:
$\exists ~N_1 \in \Bbb{Z^+},~$ such that
for all $~n \geq N_1, ~a_n \in (a - \epsilon, a + \epsilon).$
$\exists ~N_2 \in \Bbb{Z^+},~$ such that
for all $~n \geq N_2, ~b_n \in (b - \epsilon, b + \epsilon).$
Set $~n = \max(N_1,N_2).$
This implies that :
$b_n < b + \epsilon.$
$a - \epsilon < a_n.$
Also, per the definition of $~\epsilon,~$ $(b + \epsilon) < (a - \epsilon).$
So, you can conclude that
$$b_n < (b + \epsilon) < (a - \epsilon) < a_n.$$
This contradicts the constraint that for all $~n, ~a_n \leq b_n.$