For the triangle $ABC$, let $I$ the incenter and $I_A$ the A-excenter. If $L$ the midpoint of arc $BC$, we can show that $L$ is the center of a circle through $I, I_A, B, C.$ Also, if the incircle touches $AB, AC$ at $P, Q$ and $BI, CI$ intersect with $PQ$ at $K, L$ we may show that circumcircle of $ILK$ is tangent to incircle of $ABC$ if and only if $AB+AC=3BC.$ My problem is that if the line through $I$ is perpendicular to $BI$ and meets $AC$ at $X,$ while the line through $I$ perpendicular to $CI$ meets $AB$ at $Y$ and $AB+AC=3BC$, I stuck to show that $X, I_A, Y$ are collinear
2026-04-04 04:36:05.1775277365
Triangle, incenter and perpendicular line
127 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in EUCLIDEAN-GEOMETRY
- Visualization of Projective Space
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
- Circle inside kite inside larger circle
- If in a triangle ABC, ∠B = 2∠C and the bisector of ∠B meets CA in D, then the ratio BD : DC would be equal to?
- Euclidean Fifth Postulate
- JMO geometry Problem.
- Measure of the angle
- Difference between parallel and Equal lines
- Complex numbers - prove |BD| + |CD| = |AD|
- Find the ratio of segments using Ceva's theorem
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It is hard to extract a question from the OP. So i suppose the question is solved by the following result:
Proof:
The relation $AP=AQ=p-a$ holds in a general triangle. In our case, we have further $p-a=(a+b+c)/2-a=(a+3a)/2-a=2a-a=a=BC$.
The triangles $\Delta AIP$, $\Delta AIQ$, $\Delta BC^*C$, $\Delta CB^*B$ are congruent, because they have a right angle in $P$, $Q$, $C$, and respectively $B$, and they have equal catetes, $a=AP=AQ=BC$, and $IP=IQ=IR=BB^*=CC^*$. In particular, the hypotenuses are correspondingly equal, and the other angles, too: $$ \begin{aligned} &AI = BC^*=B^*C\ ,\\ &\widehat{C^*BC}=\widehat{B^*CB}=\frac 12\hat A \ . \end{aligned} $$ By construction, $BB^*$, $CC^*$ are parallel, equal, and build right angles with $BC$. So $BCC^*B^*$ rectangle. The intersection of the diagonals satisfies the above property that determines $V$, $\widehat{C^*BC}=\widehat{B^*CB}=\frac 12\hat A $, so this intersection is on the circle $(ABC)$, and it is the mid point of the arc $\overset \frown{BC}$, so it is $V$. The quadrilateral $IBI_AC$ is also cyclic, two opposite right angles, and $II_A$ is a diameter of the circle $(IBI_AC)$. Its mid point is $V$, the second intersection point of $AII_A$ with the circle $(ABC)$, so the two circles $(IBI_AC)$ and $(BCC^*B^*)$ coincide, and we have the long equality of segments: $$ AW=WI=IV=VB=VC=VB^*=VC^*=VI_A\ . $$
Let us now show the properties related to $U$. By construction, the segment $UI$ is parallel and equal to $BB^*$ and $CC^*$. So $UBB^*I$ is a parallelogram. So $$ \widehat{BUR}= \widehat{BUI}= \widehat{BB^*I}= \widehat{BCI}\ . $$ The line $CI$ is thus perpendicular on $BU$. Similarly $BI\perp CU$. So $I$ is the orthocenter in $UBC$, and $B,I,K$ are colinear, and $C,I,L$ are colinear.
Let us show that $P,Q,K,L$ are colinear. For this, we use an inversion $\#$ with center $I$ and power $-IP^2=-IQ^2=-IR^2$, this argument is simplest from my point of view, a picture for this argument would be:
The point $P$ is transformed in its opposite $P^{\#}$ w.r.t. the center of inversion $I$, so $PP^{\#}$ is a diameter in $(I)$.
The point $Q$ is transformed in its opposite $Q^{\#}$, so $QQ^{\#}$ is a diameter in $(I)$.
The point $K$ is transformed in $K^{\#}=B$. (Because the triangles $\Delta IKU$, $\Delta IRB$ are similar, so $IK\cdot IB=IU\cdot IR=-IR^2$.) Similarly, $L$ is transformed in $L^{\#}=C$. To show that $P,Q,K,L$ are colinear, we show equivalently that the transformed points $P^{\#}$, $Q^{\#}$, $B=K^{\#}$, $C=L^{\#}$ are on a circle through $I$. (This is of course the circle $(IBC)$, and we already have a lot of points on it, i wanted two more, this is the reason for this approach.)
It is enough to show $P^{\#}$ on the circle $(IBC)$. We show this by comparison of the angles in $P^{\#}$ and $I$ in the quadrilateral $IP^{\#}CB$. A first progress in this direction is given by the remark that $U,K,P^{\#},C$ are colinear. (Because their transformed points $R,B,P,L$ are on a circle through $I$, yes, it is a circle with diameter $BI$.) So $P^{\#}$ is the symmetric of $U$ w.r.t. $K$. We then compute:
$$
\begin{aligned}
\widehat{BP^{\#}C}
&=
\pi-\widehat{BP^{\#}U}\\
&=
\pi-\widehat{BUP^{\#}}\\
&=
\pi-\widehat{LUK}\\
&=
\widehat{LIK}\\
&=
\widehat{BIC}\ .
\end{aligned}
$$
The comparison shows we have to equal angles in $P^{\#}$ and $I$ in the quadrilateral $IP^{\#}CB$, so it is cyclic, this is exactly what we wanted. Same game for $Q^{\#}$.
Let us show the colinearity of $X,Y,I_A$. (I could not find a simple Desargue or Pappus argument, mainly because the points $X,Y$ are on lines defined by too few "distinguished points". So the argument is inversion again. So i inserted the above "short prelude", same thematical idea.) We denote by $X^{\#}$, $Y^{\#}$, $I_A^{\#}$ the points obtained from $X,Y,I_A$ by the same inversion $\#$.
Firstly, $I_A^{\#}$ is the point on $II_A$ at the intersection with $PQ$ because of $$ II_A^{\#}\cdot IA = IP^2\ . $$ Secondly, the point $Y^{\#}$ is on $IB^*$, and also on the circle which is the image by inversion of the line $APB$. The point $A^{\#}$ is the intersection of $IA$ with $P^{\#}Q^{\#}$. It is also the symmetrical point of $I_A^{\#}$ w.r.t. $I$. The points $P,Q$ have already discussed inverses, $P^{\#}$, $Q^{\#}$, so that $PP^{\#}$, and $QQ^{\#}$ are diameters. Shortly, $Y^{\#}$ is the point on the circle with diameter $IP^{\#}$ which is the second intersection point with the line perpendicular on $IL$ in $I$.
The point $X^{\#}$ is located similarly, it is the point on the circle with diameter $IQ^{\#}$ which is the second intersection point with the line perpendicular on $IK$ in $I$.
We want to show that the points $I, X^{\#}, Y^{\#},I_A^{\#}$ are on a circle.
We construct the point $Z$ as the intersection $Q^{\#}X^{\#}\cap P{\#}Y{\#}$.
Observe that $Q^{\#}X^{\#}\|IK$, both lines being perpendicular on $X^{\#}IC^*$. So $Q^{\#}X^{\#}Z\perp UP^{\#}$, because $IK\perp UP^{\#}$. Similarly $P^{\#}Y^{\#}Z\perp UQ^{\#}$.
So $Z$ is the orthocenter in the triangle $\Delta UQ^{\#}P^{\#}$.
So $UZ\perp Q^{\#}P^{\#}$.
So $UZ\perp PLKQ$. We want to show that $Z$ is on this last line. For this observe that $\Delta UPQ\equiv \Delta ZQ^{\#}P^{\#}$, because the sides are parallel, and one corresponding side has the same length,
$PQ\equiv Q^{\#}P^{\#}$. So $UPQ^{\#}Z$ and $UQP^{\#}Z$ are parallelograms. So $UZ=PQ^{\#}=QP^{\#}$. But $PLKQ$ is mid line in $\Delta UQ^{\#}Q^{\#}$, so the distance from $U$ to $PLKQ$ is the same as the distance $PQ^{\#}=QP^{\#}$ between the parallels $PQ\| Q^{\#}P^{\#}$. So $Z$ is on the mid line.
From $II_A^{\#}A\perp PLKQ$ we immediately conclude:
The points $X^{\#}$, $Y^{\#}$, $I_A^{\#}$, lie on the circle with diameter $IZ$.
$\square$