I'm hoping someone can tell me if this seems like a legitimate argument.
Problem: compute $I:=\iiint_E \sin (xy) - \sin (xz) + \sin (yz) \,dx \,dy \,dz$ where $E = \{(x,y,z) \in \mathbb{R}^3 : 1 \le x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \le 4 \}$.
Claim: $I = 0$.
First we split it up $I = \iiint_E \sin (xy) \,dx \,dy \,dz - \iiint_E \sin (xz) \,dx \,dy \,dz + \iiint_E \sin (yz) \,dx \,dy \,dz$. Let's examine just the first of these three: we show $\iiint_E \sin (xy) \,dx \,dy \,dz =0$. The key is to decompose the region $E$ and exploit symmetry. $E$ can be decomposed into several "pieces:" let
- $E_{x=0} = \{ (x,y,z) \in E : x = 0 \}$
- $E_{y=0} =\{(x,y,z) \in E : y = 0\}$
- $E_{++} = \{ (x,y,z) \in E : x,y >0 \}$
- $E_{-+} = \{(x,y,z) \in E : x <0 , y >0 \}$
- $E_{+-} = \{(x,y,z) \in E : x >0 , y <0 \}$
- $E_{--} = \{(x,y,z) \in E : x <0 , y <0 \}$
and the union of the above is precisely $E$. We establish a bijection between $E_{++}$ and $E_{-+}$ so that the values of the integrand at corresponding points differ by $-1$: given $(a,b,z) \in E_{++}$ so that $a,b >0$ we associate the point $(-a,b,z) \in E_{-+}$ and this defines a bijection. Furthermore $\sin (ab) = - \sin (-ab)$ because $\sin$ is odd. Thus $\sin (ab) + \sin (-ab) = 0$. We establish a bijection between $E_{+-}$ and $E_{--}$ with the same feature by sending $(a,-b,z) \in E_{+-}$ to $(-a,-b,z)\in E_{--}$. We note that on $E_{x=0}$ and $E_{y=0}$ the integrand $\sin(xy)$ is $0$. All of this together shows that $\iiint_E \sin (xy) \,dx \,dy \,dz =0$.
Symmetric arguments show that the other two integrals are $0$, although the subdivisions into pieces will be oriented differently.
Therefore $I=0$.
Does this seem correct? I really hope so, because otherwise I have no idea how to solve this problem. Actually if someone is aware of another way I'd be interested to hear it. Thank you!
You have absolutely the right idea, but are working a bit too hard. In particular, there is no need to consider your sets $E_{x=0}$, $E_{y=0}$, and $E_{z=0}$, as a triple integral over a plane will always vanish (formally, these are all sets of measure zero). Similarly, you don't need to break $E$ into quite so many regions. It is enough to note (and aim towards) the following:
We say that $f(x,y,z)$ is odd with respect to $x$ if $f(-x,y,z) = - f(x,y,z)$. Note that we only negate one component at a time. We say that $E$ is symmetric with respect to $x$ if $(x,y,z) \in E \iff (-x, y, z) \in E$.
My approach
Consider the integral $I_1=\iiint\limits_E \sin(x y) ~\mathrm{d}x \, \mathrm{d} y \, \mathrm{d} z$. The integrand is odd with respect to $x$, as $\sin((-x) y) = \sin(- xy) = - \sin(xy)$ and $E$ is symmetric with respect to $x$ as $$(-x,y,z) \in E \iff 1 \leq (-x)^2 + y^2 + z^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \leq 4 \iff (x,y,z) \in E.$$ Therefore $I_1 = 0$.
By similar argument, we have that the two other integrals vanish, and thus $I=0$.