For a formula $ \gamma = r \iff (p_1 \vee p_2) $ there is true that: $\rho \models \gamma \iff \rho(r) = \max(\rho(p_1), \rho(p_2))$
Is it a true for every formula r?
For a formula $ \gamma = r \iff (p_1 \vee p_2) $ there is true that: $\rho \models \gamma \iff \rho(r) = \max(\rho(p_1), \rho(p_2))$
Is it a true for every formula r?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
Your question is very terse and hard to understand. It is particularly confusing to use a symbol like $\iff$ both as an object language symbol (i.e., to form formulas) and as a metalanguage symbol (i.e., to abbreviate assertions about formulas). Let me write out (rather verbosely, by way of contrast) what I think you mean:
Assuming the usual definitions of everything involved, this is true and can be proved quite directly from the definition of the satisfaction relation $\models$. If you are having problems with this, you need to give some more details about the particular definitions you are working with and what you have tried.