I'm having some problems in obtaining $x$ from this example $y=0,1001\cdot \ln(x)+0,3691$. After some aptempts I got: $$e^{((y-0,3691)/0,1001)}=x$$ Is this even close to the correct result?
2026-05-04 11:05:05.1777892705
Trying to get x from a ln function
66 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGARITHMS
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- Extracting the S from formula
- How to prove the following inequality (log)
- Rewriting $(\log_{11}5)/(\log_{11} 15)$
- How to solve this equation with $x$ to a logarithmic power?
- Show that $\frac{1}{k}-\ln\left(\frac{k+1}{k}\right)$ is bounded by $\frac{1}{k^2}$
- Why do we add 1 to logarithms to get number of digits?
- Is my method correct for to prove $a^{\log_b c} = c^{\log_b a}$?
- How to prove the inequality $\frac{1}{n}+\frac{1}{n+1}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2n-1}\geq \log (2)$?
- Unusual Logarithm Problem
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Since you already have the correct solution, I think it's valid to just give you the necessary steps to obtain it, so you can check your calculation. You started with:
$y = 0.1001 \cdot ln(x) + 0.3691$
You subtract $0.3691$ from both sides, then you divide by $0.1001$ on both sides. You end up with:
$\frac{y-0.3691}{0.1001} = ln(x)$.
Now you need the knowledge that the inverse function of $e^x$ is $ln(x)$, in other words, $ln(e^x)=x$ and also $e^{ln(x)}=x$. So you can take the values on both sides and put them in the exponent of the exponential function and end up with:
$e^{\frac{y-0.3691}{0.1001}} = e^{ln(x)} = x$.
In other words, we just showed that
$x= e^{\frac{y-0.3691}{0.1001}}$.
And this is the result you managed to obtain yourself, so I think you followed a similar chain of steps as well.