enter link description here I was working on the proof of Ascoli-Arzela Theorem (10.3) at the link above. However two points in there are not clear for me.
1st For necessity, we take $\mathcal F$ as a collection of functions from $C(X)$. Why do we prove elements of $\mathcal F$ are uniformly continuous i.e. $\mathcal F$ is equicontinuous? I think since $X$ is compact every functions of $C(X)$ must be uniformly continuous thus every subset of $C(X)$ is equicontinuous. I’m in I miss somewhere.
2nd For sufficiency, I’m okay with the parts until defining $\varphi$ function. However I cannot get remainings. We’re trying to show that $\mathcal F$ is totally bounded since it will be sufficient for the compactness of $\overline {\mathcal F}$. However I cannot understand how we get totally boundedness. What is our $\varepsilon$-net and open balls?
If anyone can explain them to me, I will be very very happy. I appreciate any help. Thanks
P.S. : My questions can be so silly. I’m sorry in advance.
It is true that if a subset $\mathcal{F}\subset C(X)$ is equicontinuous, then every $f\in\mathcal{F}$ is uniformly continuous. But the converse is not true. Namely, in order to show that a given collection $\mathcal{F}\subset C(X)$ is equicontinuous, it does not suffice to show that each $f\in\mathcal{F}$ is uniformly continuous. See, for instance, this example.
Note that $\varphi$ is a map from $\{1,\cdots,N\}$ to $\{1,\cdots,K\}$. There are only finitely many such maps. Denote the set of all these maps as $J$. Then $$ \mathcal{F}=\bigcup_{\varphi\in J}\mathcal{F}_{\varphi} $$ where $J$ is a finite set. It is shown in your notes that $\operatorname{diam} F_{\varphi}\le \varepsilon$. This shows that $\mathcal{F}$ is totally bounded. See this definition. The language of "open balls" is not used in this context.