The uniformization theorem answers this question for particular Riemann surfaces, but do we have a general theorem for this? Do we also get meromorphic functions that can separate points?
2025-01-13 05:57:22.1736747842
Under what conditions do there exist non-constant meromorphic functions between general Riemann surfaces?
298 Views Asked by user98246 https://math.techqa.club/user/user98246/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in RIEMANN-SURFACES
- Deduce riemannian mapping theorem for domains of $\hat{\mathbb{C}}$ from uniformization theorem
- Is there a complex surface into which every Riemann surface embeds?
- cohomology of a tangent bundle
- Show $f$ is an immersion, where $f$ holomorphic map between compact Riemann Surfaces
- Are there closed Riemann surfaces without non-constant holomorphic functions?
- Meromorphic function written as Weierstrass Elliptic Function
- Under what conditions do there exist non-constant meromorphic functions between general Riemann surfaces?
- Riemann surface with $w=z-\sqrt{z^2-1}$ single-valued
- Is the fundamental group of a compact Riemann surface *after* removing a finite number of points still a Fuchsian group?
- What are the morphisms in the category of unramified coverings over a compact Riemann surface?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
Given a complex Riemann surface $X$ and two points $x,y\in X$ there always exist a meromorphic function $f\in \mathcal M (X)$ which is holomorphic at both $x$ and $y$ and such that $f(x)\neq f(y)\in \mathbb C$.
a) If $X$ is non-compact you may even assume that $f\in \mathcal O(X)$ is holomorphic everywhere.
b) But if $X$ is compact then $\mathcal O(X)=\mathbb C$ and $f$ will necessarily have at least one pole .
These are highly non-trivial results going back to Riemann but of course his proofs do not meet contemporary standards of rigor: the first precise definition of "Riemann surface" goes back to Weyl's Die Idee der Riemannschen Fläche, published in 1913, 47 years after Riemann's death in 1866...
A high-brow explanation for these results is that a non compact Riemann surface is a Stein manifold (Behnke-Stein 1948) and that a compact Riemann surface is a projective manifold, to which Serre's GAGA principle applies.
By far the best modern reference for Riemann surfaces is Otto Forster's book.