An old set of classroom notes I took in a math course says the following:
For a set ${X}$ let $\mathcal{A}$ be a set of functions from $X$ to $\mathbb{R}$. Then
- the uniform closure of $\mathcal{A}$ is uniformly closed.
- the pointwise closure of $\mathcal{A}$ is not necessarily pointwise closed.
The prof said the first assertion was straightforward (we proved it as homework) but that the second was not (I came up with a counter-example).
I'd like to write up the counter-example in a short note, but I don't even know what field of math this is in. Topology? Real analysis? Specifically, I'd like some easily accessed (preferably online) citations that discuss and give background to these assertions. So far my online searches have landed on discussions that assume the functions form an algebra, or have restrictions such as boundedness or continuity.
A suitable context for discussion of the assertions is the concept of Baire functions and Baire classes. Quoting from the linked article:
So, if $\mathcal{A}$ is the set of continuous functions, its pw(pointwise) closure is the set of Baire class 1 functions, and the pw closure of that is the set of Baire class 2 functions, etc. In other words, the pw closure of $\mathcal{A}$ is not pw closed.
Coming up with more restricted examples of $\mathcal{A}$ is another problem.