Given $2$ locally small categories $\textsf{D}$ and $\textsf{C}$, consider a functor $K:\textsf{D}\to\textsf{C}$ and an object $C\in\textsf{C}$. A universal arrow from $K$ is a couple $D\in\textsf{D}$ together with an arrow $u:C\to KD$ such that for every $f:C\to KD'$ there exists a unique $\bar{f}:D\to D'$ which satisfies $$K\bar{f}\circ u=f$$ If we consider a free algebraic structure such as a free group or a vector space, it is pretty clear this property holds true for the forgetful functor $U$, but that comes along since we have a left adjoint for $U$, namely the free functor $F$. Is there an example of functor with universal arrow which isn't explained by an adjoint pair?
2026-03-27 22:00:26.1774648826
Universal arrow example which doesn't come as an adjoint pair?
54 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in ADJOINT-FUNCTORS
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- How do I apply the Yoneda lemma to this functor?
- Determining Left Adjoint of Forgetful Functor from $\tau_{*}$ to $\tau$
- What is the left adjoint to forgetful functor from Mod(R) to Ab
- Does the left adjoint to the forgetful functor have another left adjoint?
- Is coreflectiveness transitive?
- Group algebra functor preserves colimits
- Intuition for remembering adjunction chirality
- Does the inverse image sheaf functor has a left adjoint?
- Significance of adjoint relationship with Ext instead of Hom
Related Questions in UNIVERSAL-PROPERTY
- Where there exists a unique arrow from $n: L \to K$ as a UMP can we reverse $n$?
- Exponentiation property of the modulo operator
- Cartesian product uniqueness (up to bijection). Need to clarify two questions.
- Theorem about Universal Property for Vector Spaces
- What are the obtained consequences in mathematics if the antiderivative of $e^{-x²}$ and $e^{x²}$ expressed as elementary functions?
- Closed form of $I(a)=\int_{0}^a {(e^{-x²})}^{\operatorname{erf}(x)}dx $ and is it behave similar with error function?
- What is the asymptotic series of :$I(a)=\int_{0}^a {(e^{-x²})}^{\operatorname{erf}(x)}dx $ and does it have a complementary function?
- Why Owen's selected this function $f(h,x)=\frac{e^{-\frac 12 h^2(1+x²)}}{1+x²}$ for integration?
- Constructing a solenoid to satisfy its universal property as a projective limit over circles
- The Universal Property of a Universal C$^{*}$-algebra
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
$K : \mathcal{D} \to \mathcal{C}$ is a right adjoint iff for every $C \in \mathcal{C}$ there is a universal arrow from $C$ to $K$. So it suffices to give an example of a functor which is "partially right adjoint" but not "totally right adjoint". Equivalently, when we see $K$ as a forgetful functor, it suffices to find a free $\mathcal{D}$-structure on some object of $\mathcal{C}$ such that however not every object of $\mathcal{C}$ has a free $\mathcal{D}$-structure.
Consider for example the forgetful functor from finite groups to sets. There is a free (finite group) on an empty set, but no free (finite group) on a non-empty set (see below).
Or consider the forgetful functor from complete boolean algebras to sets. For every finite set $X$ there is a free complete boolean algebra on that set (namely $P(P(X))$ with the usual operations), but this fails for every infinite set by a result of Hales.
Here is a proof that if $X$ is a non-empty set then there is no free (finite group) on $X$. (Notice that it is not enough to prove that the free group on $X$ is not finite.) Assume that it exists, name it $F$. Choose some $x \in X$. Its image in $F$ is also denoted by $x \in F$. Since $F$ is finite, $x^n=1$ for some $n \in \mathbb{N}^+$. Now if $G$ is any finite group and $g \in G$, then there is a map $X \to G$, sending everything to $g$. It extends to a (finite group) homomorphism $F \to G$, sending in particular $x$ to $g$. It follows $g^n=1$. This is a contradiction, since there are finite groups with elements of order $n+1$.