Unnecessary Condition for Alternating Series Test

190 Views Asked by At

Given a series $$ \sum^\infty_{n=0} (-1)^n b_n$$ the Alternating Series test states that if $b_n$ is convergent if

1) $b_n$ is positive

2) $b_n$ is monotonically decreasing

3) $\lim_{n\to\infty} b_n = 0$

Every proof of this theorem requires these to all be true, but what I wonder is whether this theorem would still hold if (2) was omitted.

In essence, can you think of an example where the alternating series diverges if (1) and (3) are satisfied but not (2)?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

3
On BEST ANSWER

$$b_n=\left\{ \begin{array}{lc} \frac{1}{n} &\mbox{ if } n \mbox{ is even } \\ \frac{1}{n^2} & \mbox{ if } n \mbox{ is odd } \end{array} \right.$$

One another hand, if $b_n$ is decreasing and $\lim_n b_n=0$ then $b_n \geq 0$, so 1) is actually redundant.

Added :the partial sum $S_{2n}$ is

$$S_{2n}=\sum_{k=0}^{2n} (-1)^kb_k=\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{2n}-\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}$$

Now, since $\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{2n} \to \infty$ and $\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}$ is convergent, you get that $S_{2n} \to \infty$, which shows that the series is divergent.