Find the sum of the roots, real and non-real, of the equation $x^{2001}+\left(\frac 12-x\right)^{2001}=0$, given that there are no multiple roots.
While trying to solve the above problem (AIME 2001, Problem 3) which was asked here on MSE, I came across three solutions on AoPS. ( The MSE solution uses Vieta's formula which I am clear about )
The first solution (on AoPS) involves the use of Vieta's formula's and is quite clear.
The third solution states the following :
Note that if $r$ is a root, then $\frac{1}{2}-r$ is a root and they sum up to $\frac{1}{2}.$
We make the substitution $y=x-\frac{1}{4}$ so $(\frac{1}{4}+y)^{2001}+(\frac{1}{4}-y)^{2001}=0.$
Expanding gives $2\cdot\frac{1}{4}\cdot\binom{2001}{1}y^{2000}-0y^{1999}+\cdots$ so by Vieta, the sum of the roots of $y$ is 0.
Since $x$ has a degree of 2000, then $x$ has 2000 roots so the sum of the roots is $2000(\sum_{n=1}^{2000} y+\frac{1}{4})=2000(0+\frac{1}{4})=\boxed{500}.$
I do not understand two things in the above solution :
- "Note that if $r$ is a root, then $\frac{1}{2}-r$ is a root and they sum up to $\frac{1}{2}.$"
a) Here what is being referred to as "they"? (Shouldn't $\frac{1}{2}-r$ be a factor and not a root). Answered by the third comment
b)Why is the sum 1/2? Also answered by the third comment
c)Why is $\frac{1}{2}-r$ a root? Answered by the sixth comment
- How is the final expression arrived upon to find the sum of all 2000 roots? (Answered by @YvesDaoust)
The second solution is more mystifying (possibly because it is similar to the one above):
We find that the given equation has a $2000^{\text{th}}$ degree polynomial. Note that there are no multiple roots. Thus, if $\frac{1}{2} - x$ is a root, $x$ is also a root. Thus, we pair up $1000$ pairs of roots that sum to $\frac{1}{2}$ to get a sum of $\boxed{500}$.
Again, why is $\frac{1}{2} - x$ a root. By "$x$ is also a root" does it mean $x$ representing the set of all roots? Answered by the sixth comment
Why does the pairing up occur?
Why is the sum of each pair 1/2?(Answered by @YvesDaoust)
I wonder if it could be solved as follows :
Let the roots be $P_1,P_2,...P_{2000}$. The polynomial can be expressed as a product of factors as follows : $(2001/2)($x$-P_1)($x$-P_2)....($x$-P_{2000}) = 0$. The above expression is the same as $x^{2001}+\left(\frac 12-x\right)^{2001}=0$.
Thus, $x^{2001}+\left(\frac 12-x\right)^{2001}$ = $(2001/2)($x$-P_1)($x$-P_2)....($x$-P_{2000})$
Here the coefficient of $x^{1999}$ on the $RHS$ should represent $\sum\limits_{i=1}^{2000}P_i$$\times$$(-1/2)$
On the $LHS$ the corresponding term would be the term with $x^{1999}$ and thus the coefficient of this term on the $LHS$ should also be the required sum.
On the LHS the coefficient of the $x^{1999}$ term is -${2001}\choose{2}$*$(1/2)^2$ which represent the sum of the roots.
[Picked up this approach here, but I don't see how this would work ] (https://youtu.be/S6FRtmDUl-s?t=2806)
In this solution I find some errors(?) :
- Are there any inconsistencies in the reasoning?
Wouldn't the sum of roots differ from the binomial coefficient since the expression involves unique values of $P_i$ (no multiple roots). - The answers do not match, which seems to suggest so.
- Is there a way of arriving at the answer without using Vieta's formula and by expressing the polynomial as a product of factors and then using binomial coefficients as attempted above?
First solution:
By symmetry of $x^n+(\frac12-x)^n$, if $x$ is a root, so is $\frac12-x$. Now if you take the roots in pairs ($1000$ pairs), the sum of the individual pairs is $x+\frac12-x=\frac12$. Hence in total $1000\cdot\dfrac12$.
Second solution:
There is no difference with the first.
Extra solution:
By Vieta, the sum of the roots is the negative ratio of the two coefficients of the highest degree. Then using the Binomial theorem,
degree $2001$: $1-1=0$,
degree $2000$: $\dfrac12\dfrac{2001}2\left(-\dfrac12\right)$,
degree $1999$: $\dfrac{2001}2\left(\dfrac{2001-1}2\right)\left(-\dfrac12\right)^2$.
The requested ratio is indeed $500$.