$\newcommand{\textand}{\hspace{5pt}\text{and}\hspace{5pt}}$ In a recent proof of mine, I used the two symbols $\theta$ and $\vartheta$ for different variable angles. My supervisor noted that this can be confusing to read since both are a lowercase theta. However, I read $\vartheta$ as ''vartheta'' and thus I thought that this could be a symbolic analogue of using any of the pairs $$ \theta \textand \theta',\hspace{10pt} \theta \textand \widetilde{\theta},\hspace{10pt} \theta \textand \overline{\theta},\hspace{10pt} \theta \textand \hat{\theta},\hspace{10pt} \theta_{1} \textand \theta_{2}, $$ when one would like exactly two different but related variables. I have changed it to $\theta$ and $\phi$, but I have two questions:
$1.$ Is it improper to use both $\theta$ and $\vartheta$ in the same statement to mean different variables?
$2.$ Is it good practise to stick to just one of the two in a document?
Think how confusing it would be if you used $a$ and $\mathrm{a}$ together as different symbols. That's basically what you've done: a cursive and a non-cursive version of the same letter $\theta$.
And won't someone please think of the handwriting! You've completely destroyed any ability for someone to hand-write things by copying them from your paper.