I am asked to use index notation to prove that $\nabla\cdot(\overrightarrow{u}\times\overrightarrow{v})=(\nabla\times\overrightarrow{u})\cdot\overrightarrow{v}-\overrightarrow{u}\cdot(\nabla\times\overrightarrow{v})$. Below is so far I have worked:
By index notation, there is \begin{equation*} \overrightarrow{u}\times\overrightarrow{v}=u_{i}v_{j}\epsilon_{ijk}\hat{e}_{k} \end{equation*} \begin{equation*} \Downarrow \end{equation*} \begin{equation*} \nabla\cdot(\overrightarrow{u}\times\overrightarrow{v})=\partial_{l}u_{i}v_{j}\epsilon_{ijk}\delta_{kl} \end{equation*} Then we notice \begin{equation*} (\nabla\times\overrightarrow{u})\cdot\overrightarrow{v}=\partial_{l}u_{i}\epsilon_{lik}\hat{e}_{k}\cdot v_{j}\hat{e}_{j}=\partial_{l}u_{i}v_{j}\epsilon_{lik}\delta_{kj} \end{equation*} \begin{equation*} \overrightarrow{u}\cdot(\nabla\times\overrightarrow{v})=u_{i}\hat{e}_{i}\cdot\partial_{l}v_{j}\epsilon_{ljk}\hat{e}_{k}=\partial_{l}u_{i}v_{j}\epsilon_{ljk}\delta_{ik} \end{equation*}
Then I am stuck here. It seems that we have to show $\epsilon_{lik}\delta_{kj}-\epsilon_{ljk}\delta_{ik}=\epsilon_{ijk}\delta_{kl}$, yet I have no clue of doing so. Any hint please?
Yes, you are on the right track. As already said in the comments, you can use the fact that $\epsilon_{lik}\delta_{kj}=\epsilon_{lij}$ and the product rule to get the desired result. However, it is worth pointing out that you do not need to explicitly use the Kronecker delta and the basis vectors $\hat e_k$ to arrive at the result. Note that