Is there a way to decide if two virtual knot diagrams are equivalent using only second Reidemeister moves and virtual moves (i.e. the Reidemeister moves where at least one crossing is virtual)? Some algorithm?
2026-03-25 06:10:33.1774419033
Virtual knot diagrams equivalent by second Reidemeister moves
56 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in KNOT-THEORY
- Is unknot a composite knot?
- Can we modify one component of a link and keep the others unchanged
- Can we split a splittable link by applying Reidemeister moves to non-self crossings only
- Involution of the 3 and 4-holed torus and its effects on some knots and links
- Equivalence polygonal knots with smooth knots
- Can a knot diagram be recovered from this data?
- Does Seifert's algorithm produce Seifert surfaces with minimal genus?
- Equivalence of links in $R^3$ or $S^3$
- Homotopy type of knot complements
- The complement of a knot is aspherical
Related Questions in KNOT-INVARIANTS
- Can we modify one component of a link and keep the others unchanged
- Can we split a splittable link by applying Reidemeister moves to non-self crossings only
- Does Seifert's algorithm produce Seifert surfaces with minimal genus?
- Coloring of a knot diagram by a trivial quandle
- How to obtain all possible colorings of a knot diagram by a given quandle
- Are any knot volumes known to be (ir)rational? If not, then why is the question difficult?
- Alternating and Non-Altenating Knot projections with same crossing number?
- what is a delta move on a trefoil knot
- Quantum invariants of 2-knots
- On Alexander polynomial of a knot
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes: reduce the diagram to a form where no destructive RII move is possible.
Claim: that reduced form uniquely determines the equivalence class of the knot.
Proof (sketch): think in terms of Gauss diagrams, which allows you to forget about the virtual moves since these don't change the diagram by definition. From the reduced form defined above, add crossings via a sequence of creative RII moves. After the sequence, if you want to perform a destructive move, the only option is to use at least one arrow that was just created and therefore the other arrow used is either the very one that was created simultaneously, or another one "parallel" to that. In any case the only option is to undo one of the moves that was just performed.